Has the Super 6 been a success?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jack, Aug 10, 2010.


  1. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    So far it's been a failure.

    In the first fight a shot Jermain Taylor could hardly move without getting warned for something while Abraham fouled his ass off, and the ref turned a blind eye.

    The second fight was atrocious. One of the worst so called "world Class" fights I've ever seen.

    In Ward/Kessler Andre Ward threw 9 head butts and landed 5 of them. Nuff said.

    The inclusion of Allan "I can't feel my feet" Green was a complete joke.

    In Dirrell/Abraham the guy who constantly complains about his opponents "fouling" him got DQed for a blatant foul.

    Kessler/Froch was the only decent fight so far.

    You really have to be a blind and bias nuthugger to call this thing a success.
     
  2. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
  3. oli

    oli Boxing Junkie banned

    8,804
    2
    Mar 11, 2010
    Its an exciting thing the super 6, apart from hometown judging tho, my only other gripe is that it has dragged on a little bit.

    Since all the fights were pre arranged theres no reason why they couldnt have speeded **** up and had them doing 3 fights a year instead of one every 6 months or whatever it is.
     
  4. dwighttsharpe

    dwighttsharpe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,306
    1
    Jan 31, 2009
    Of course it has it's faults, but there is no way all this many top guys would have fought each other in a 2 year span.

    These are good matchups. What other division is having matchups like this.

    Whether or not each actual fight turns out to be so satisfying cannot always be predetermined.
     
  5. TboneNYC

    TboneNYC World Champion Full Member

    2,059
    1
    Mar 27, 2010
    It was definitely a good thing,i just wish they would take the fights to a more neutral grounds.
     
  6. FinalBELL

    FinalBELL Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,582
    0
    Aug 4, 2009
    Normally yes, but this is a tournament. A tournament should not take this long and be called succesfull.
     
  7. DemolitionDan

    DemolitionDan ATG and HoF Full Member

    17,643
    10
    Jun 29, 2009
    There haven't been any robberies. And the hometown fighter is winning because they are either knocking someone the **** out, winning by an illegal blow, or just flat out whooping the other, schooling them and making them look bad.

    BOT, the Super 6 is throwing the best of the best, 6 great fighters (well may'be 5. Green hasn't exactly done anything great) and nobody is ducking anybody . We are also getting some Fight Camp 360's. I don't see how anybody can hate on this tournament.
     
  8. Finn73

    Finn73 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,322
    0
    Jun 22, 2008
    That's a US thing only. The Super Six is packed with well-known fighters (in Europe). It's vice versa - MMA is completely unknown here...nobody cares.
     
  9. shan7-8-6

    shan7-8-6 Active Member Full Member

    1,298
    0
    Sep 3, 2009
    This is exactly what i was thinkin....wen i saw the so called ******ed boxing fans saying it was slow....how often do you get top fighters fighting each other and not some random walk over bum? Exactly....enjoy the show....and dont ***** about it...:thumbsup
     
  10. DemolitionDan

    DemolitionDan ATG and HoF Full Member

    17,643
    10
    Jun 29, 2009
    I didn't see this post until shan quoted this post, but this is spot on. :good
     
  11. jomiyo

    jomiyo Guest

    Sure, you keep telling yourself that. :lol:
     
  12. makart

    makart New Member Full Member

    42
    0
    Aug 2, 2010
    yes, i like it, just wish the fights weren't so far apart ...though i understand boxers need to recuperate
     
  13. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    if this were a poll I would say yes. Never helps to have the top fighters fight the best. If they would only do this at lightweight and welterweight.
     
  14. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    "The best are fighting the best" is an outright lie. Some of the very best fighters around the weight were excluded on the basis of cost. When certain fighters are excluded because including them cost to much, that can only mean that other fighters were included because they work cheaper. Under those circumstances there is no way in hell you can legitimately claim "the best are fighting the best."
     
  15. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,130
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    Of course it's a success and more fights set to come, what is there to dislike?

    There has been some controversy and that comes with the sport, not because of this tournament.