The next time you'll completely dismiss another fighters chances

Yep.

I'm willing to put a life time avatar bet on, that Pacquiao will fail against Mayweather.

 

I'd feel fairly safe dismissing Cotto's chances should he rematch Pacquaio. So long as Manny doesn't show signs of decline when fighting Margo.

 

I can't take JCC jr's chances against Cotto serious for one moment.
Maybe that's wrong, I don't know but seriously... Chavez jr.????

 

Whoever Sugar Niko fights next, I really dont think Pacquiao will beat Mayweather.

 

i dismissed dawsons chances, and i was right yey

 

If you have a strong conviction that one guy will win, does that count as "dismissing" the other guy? I suppose I will be guilty of this the next time a big fight swings round then, I rarely sit on the fence. I have a strong conviction that Wladimir Klitschko will beat Sam Peter rather easily, so I guess I am dismissing Peter's chances in that one. I plead guilty.

 

I'd consider ''dismissing someone's chances'' as ''refusing to accept a reasonable, balanced, well put argument as to why fighter X can beat fighter Y''.

Saying ''Sam Peter might beat Wlad because Wlad has a glass chin'' isn't - Wlad has improved a lot since the first fight, Peter hasn't. My take on that one would be that Peter had his golden chance, couldn't take it and lost.

 

Damn. I expected my comment to be picked up.

I give Berto no chance against anyone good or anyone who isn't about to retire.

He got exposed by Quintana who you could almost see needed a walking stick to get to the ring.

 

Of course.

That's a good example of a reasonably put argument, which people are free to agree or disagree with.

:good