i dont understand why either, it could be freddies match making, they will fight loser of Devon and Tim bradley more likely to be Devon because of he is inferior fighter out of the two. Roach has said on the scene several times within the last month and a half that khan woukld beat those two in a single night. time to put up or shutup, i used to respect freddie but a little success has gone to his head, he never used to punk on fighters and has a serious personality change.
What do you think of the proposed Haye Vs Audley matchup? :think I have plenty to say my friend. Can you not answer the question?
That isnt anything to do with topic of the thread though has it! If you want to know my thoughts on it then start a thread about it and i will be happy to post my opinion. :smooch
There's plenty of David Haye threads around. I'd just be spamming up the Forum if I did. It's just a couple of sentences of what you think of the guy and his next proposed fight against Audley Harrison. You could have done it by now and this conversation would have been over my friend.
The fact is this is a Khan maidana thread, who cares if your spamming the forum enough tards do it everyday, honestly if you make a thread i will persoaklly make a report on why the fight should or should not happen. Back to topic dont you have questions that you are supposed to be answering from me. :think
I think kahn wants the tourny but his handlers and especially roach know that's not such a good idea. What would happen to the future cash cow if he gets ko'd in the first round?what happens if he wins a tough ud in the second and wins in the third? He will be spent going against the deep waters of 140 before they can cash him in. Not good. What would work is if the tourny was put together excluding Kahn and he fought the winner sort of like bute at 168. Might work.
Questions? You mean the tournament you were saying Khan picked out? Okay sure. You seem against the fact Khan is picking Maidana, correct? Marcos Maidana is Khan's mandatory, correct? The fight people WANT to see is Khan Vs Maidana, correct? So why are you against it? How can you call that 'picking'. Are you saying Alexander and Bradley are harder fights? Didn't Alexander lose on a wider margin to Kotelnik than Maidana?
I have a problem with him picking out maidana because he has said he is the easiest out the bunch, which means he is hand picking opponents, the worst thing is he has no intention of fighting him. However he will not fight Maidana therefore he is a fraud.
Come on mate, seriously. Hand picking a Mandatory everyone accuses you of ducking? That's bull**** right there. And please, give me a quote of where he said he's the easiest. I'd like to see that first. Oh and please PM your thoughts on Haye since I'm not up to making a thread on it. Or you could make one if you like.
Do you think HBO were unhappy with Khan v Malignaggi, which gave them their highest viewing figures for boxing since Vitali against Arreola? :?
El Chino will destroy Khan. Schaeffer and Oscar **** in their pants everytime someone mentions Maidana vs Khan
Maidana is the mandatory...whether he believes he is the easiest out of the 140lbers or not. The majority want to see him in with Maidana, especially to see how he deals with an aggressive puncher...he would not be handpicking Maidana if they ever stepped in the ring together...it would be forced otherwise he would lose his belt. Khan facing Marquez is handpicking.