Can Sugar Ray Robinson be overtaken?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ironchamp, Aug 26, 2010.


  1. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Duran had more than 120 fights actually, 123 I think.
     
  2. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    There are probably guys like Hearns or Hagler who could have beaten Robinson, but as far as number of fights and the iconic legend he is, it will be hard for anyone to ever beat him. The way guys like Roy Jones and Mayweather duck guys now, how can they be a Robinson
     
  3. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,255
    Feb 6, 2009
    :lol:yeah him, sorry about that.
     
  4. Nicky P

    Nicky P Jamiva Boxing Full Member

    1,432
    8
    Jul 21, 2010

    I'm pretty sure i read it in 'Sweet Thunder; The Life and Times of Sugar Ray Robinson' by Wil Haygood

    Good book on what was happening in the world during each of his big fights.
     
  5. Nicky P

    Nicky P Jamiva Boxing Full Member

    1,432
    8
    Jul 21, 2010

    man Burt, what I wouldn't do for a time machine.
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,282
    13,310
    Jan 4, 2008
    Are you for real? Age just a bad excuse? Sorry, but this is just too stupid to waste time on.
     
  7. stonehammerjack

    stonehammerjack Member Full Member

    450
    16
    Aug 7, 2010
    When I was growing up Benny Leonard was the one most mentioned as the best ever also. Robinson was unbelievable though and would have ko'd both Mayweather and Leonard. That time is so long ago now. Boxing was different. Rougher.
     
  8. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    agree with that part.
     
  9. Murali

    Murali Member Full Member

    276
    1
    May 1, 2009
    Some really good and informative posts here guys.

    While I am not as versed in boxing history as many of you, I believe Ray Robinson is an excellent choice for the p4p no1 of all time, as subjective as this pick may be. The depth of his resume and the number of quality opponents he beat - often by KO - in his career was exceptional. I also respect the fact that other guys may have pulled off outstanding feats in terms of jumping weight classes and notching up spectacular wins - Fitzsimmons, Langford, Greb, Armstrong, etc. - but Robinson's overall achievements in the sport have him a whisker ahead in my book.

    But to answer the question... I too believe that Robinson will probably never be surpassed in greatness in terms of his accomplishments in the ring. Few fighters take on all the best matches in their divisions nowadays and even they don't fight often enough. Yes some of the modern fighters like Roy Jones and Pacquiao would have fared very well in terms of mythical match-ups with the best fighters of yesterday but they are unlikely to surpass their achievements.
     
  10. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,562
    Jul 28, 2004
    It seems as unlikely as that 49-0 of Marciano's being overtaken...there ain't any SSR's on the horizon now, but Manny Pac is coming perillously close.
     
  11. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    You are wrong . James Toney reached pro 83 fights already and is still not retired officially , although he should be.
    MW to HW > WW to MW + a miserably failed stint at LHW.

    And Robinson never achieved the greatness of Sam Langford whom would have also beaten him H2H if there was a time machine. Langford avoided no one and fought everyone plenty of times , Robinson avoided Burley and probably more.
     
  12. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    80
    Apr 4, 2010
    Chavez also had over twice the amount of fights as Whitaker, and given that Whitaker was supposed to have had nothing to hurt him with, I'd say he did fairly well, wouldn't you?

    Not comparing Whitaker to Robinson, mind you, but your statement was just as absurd in dismissing a fighter based solely on his number of fights. Actually watching those fights would yield a more accurate depiction of the man.
     
  13. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    403
    Jan 22, 2010
    BUT, if you are NOT comparing Whitaker to Robinson as you state, than
    what is the question ?You stated 'Whitaker is not to be compared to
    Ray Robinson", and I agree with you...
    Yes Whitaker did well with Chavez..Agreed, but Chavez also was not Ray Robinson...Whitaker did very well with his limited amount of fights in his era, but Robinson had three times amount of fights, in a golden era where the top notchers fought over 100 fights, and met fighters of every style
    often...It is one thing to go through 50 or so fights without suffering
    bad defeats, but it is another ball game to go through 150 more bouts or so, against a vaster,more seasoned pool of great fighters that Robinson
    contended with...Whitaker was good in his time ,but would he go through
    Ray Robinson's opponents that Ray did ? I think not..Practice makes perfect, it is said...
     
  14. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    403
    Jan 22, 2010
    P.S. Also.it is not solely the amount of fights Ray Robinson had.Of course
    not...There were fighters that had100s oif bouts that Whitaker would have beaten...I am talking about Robby who had height ,and explosive hand speed,that would overwhelm Whitaker,without question...And
    Perenell had nothing that would hold the bigger and vicious Robinson
    off for long...
     
  15. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    14
    Jun 2, 2009
    Exactly :good