Who was the Bigger Draw?? Naz or Lennox??

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by emallini, Aug 29, 2010.


  1. bruthead

    bruthead REAL TALK Full Member

    2,308
    1
    May 3, 2009
    Naz could draw against anyone whereas Lewis had the biggest fights i.e. heavyweight title bouts against the likes of Holyfield and Tyson. Depends what you consider makes the biggest draw. Lewis was definitely bigger worldwide, though.
     
  2. mcguirpa

    mcguirpa Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,957
    106
    Feb 15, 2009
    Not true.

    As Don King famously said:

    "Lennox Lewis couldn't draw flies"

    Over their careers Lewis probably earnt more, but only because he lasted longer than Naz. In Naz's peak earning years he took a home a lot more money then Lewis.
     
  3. kerrminator

    kerrminator Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,552
    169
    Sep 14, 2007
    Naz for me no question. Never paid to see lewis fight but have paid to see Tyson fight. Iron Mike was the draw in that
     
  4. enormous

    enormous You, quadruped. Full Member

    552
    0
    Jun 18, 2010
    Interesting the opinion is so polarised.

    I'd say Naz. In a few of the fights before Barrera he had virtually everyone watching him in the hope he'd get knocked out whereas Lewis could never muster such support. Lewis would have earned more but naz was bigger, as it were.
     
  5. skel1983

    skel1983 Guest


    Remind me Lewis's numbers for ppv in the states then Naz's?

    Oh that's right Naz was never on ppv. :good

    Lewis sky ppv fights were bigger numbers aswell. :yep
     
  6. Scotty321

    Scotty321 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,516
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    Certainly in the UK, I think Naz was a bigger draw. He made his name on a Saturday night and I even remember my mum talking about him after she saw him on ITV. The pubs were always packed to watch him. Lewis being on in the wee hours on Sky didn't have the same interest. He made more $$$ and was on PPV in the states, but he was fighting in a division where interest was high because of Tyson, Holyfield, and Bowe.
     
  7. Journey Man

    Journey Man Journeyman always. Full Member

    4,943
    2,116
    Aug 22, 2009
    This. With no probably though.
     
  8. mryeags

    mryeags Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,588
    0
    Dec 20, 2008
    **** me that must be true then .... :patsch ... a more honest and truthful man I have never seen or heard before .... !
     
  9. ontheup

    ontheup Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,849
    0
    Mar 9, 2010
    :lol: But i think that is true.
     
  10. NJ1979

    NJ1979 Likes monkeys Full Member

    0
    0
    Aug 14, 2008
    Naz was certainly the bigger draw amongst everyone that I knew at the time, and by some distance. Whether that was the same elsewhere in the UK I can't answer, although given Lennox's complete lack of personality I would expect it to be the case.
     
  11. TheGiftedOne

    TheGiftedOne Active Member Full Member

    888
    0
    Oct 20, 2009
    Naz IMO, but he obviously wasn't around as long as the Great Lennox
     
  12. mcguirpa

    mcguirpa Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,957
    106
    Feb 15, 2009
    Funny thing is he was right. Lewis wasn't a draw in general.

    What's ppv numbers got to do with it? Lewis was hardly a PPV attraction himself.

    Fact is this: Money talks and Naz, in his peak earning years, earned more than Lewis in the same period. There is no come back to this simple fact when considering who was the bigger draw. Either side of the atlantic.
     
  13. NO MAS

    NO MAS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,784
    1
    Mar 2, 2009
  14. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    20
    Jul 23, 2008
    P4P it was Naz. Put it this way if Lennox was a featherweight would he be as big of an attraction?