wbc is bull****

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Mordechai, Sep 7, 2010.


  1. Mordechai

    Mordechai Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,265
    1,304
    Jun 18, 2008
    they decided that ward vs dirrell will be for the wbc belt, what a bull**** decision
     
  2. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,167
    10,605
    Jul 28, 2009
    ....What? Please tell me you mean the Froch/Abraham fight.
     
  3. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    hardly a suprise, american belt choosing americans over europeans, been the same throughout history of boxing
     
  4. Wickio

    Wickio Guest

    Nope, Ward-Dirrell will now be fought for the WBA and WBC. :-(
     
  5. Mordechai

    Mordechai Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,265
    1,304
    Jun 18, 2008
    no it's like a said, the dirrell ward fight is for the wba and wbc title.
    from the biggest british newspaper, yellow press, but it's true.

    they are dumb as ****. why don't let aa and froch fight for the wbc title and then make a big unification between both winners with a lot of hype and the final of the tournament. i bet the winner of ward or dirrell will back out of the final fight to keep their titles...
     
  6. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,465
    1,730
    Nov 20, 2007
    1st reaction: what a bunch of corrupt idiots!

    But on the 2nd thought: this might be the direct 'instruction' by Showtime and it is very beneficial for the tournament. Ward and Dirrell hesitate to fight because they are mates, but with two world titles on the line, it's pretty good motivation to make it happen. And there's no way in hell they're gonna go through with each other and then pull out from the final risking huge courtroom battles, so this might be the best way to make them stay. The titles will be on the line in the final anyway as the Froch-Abraham winner will be WBC's (and most likely WBA's) mandatory. Seemingly idiotic way, but it might just come out as the smartest.
     
  7. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,167
    10,605
    Jul 28, 2009
    Yeah, that's what they were going to do according to rumor, and when I heard that rumor, I think I implied it was too logical to actually come to fruition. ...I didn't want to actually be right though.:|
     
  8. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006

    Thats not right though thats like negotiating with terrorists.
     
  9. MagicMan91

    MagicMan91 The Main Event Mafia Full Member

    9,950
    1
    Dec 26, 2009
    I don't blame them, two fighters coming off of wins or two fighters coming off of losses fighting for your title?
     
  10. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006

    Now that makes sense, good point.

    WBC made the right decision.
     
  11. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,167
    10,605
    Jul 28, 2009
    It's not without sense but it takes something out of the tourny, imo.
     
  12. Skilletscuz

    Skilletscuz mma champ Ronda Rousey Full Member

    5,550
    0
    Jun 12, 2010
    this was my thought too, before even knowing they did have plans to retain the belt in the tournament...

    The two belts are a selling point and somewhat validates the tournament.
    Some reasons why Kessler's belt might have not been awarded to the Froch/AA fight...(doesnt mean they're good reasons)
    1) Froch had lost it to Kessler
    2) AA had lost to Dirrell
    3) a Title Unification early on might pull in attention this tournament needs from the boxing community, and may pull in casual viewers to make this as a public setting stage for the rest of the tournament
    4) Oddly enuf, the 2 americans may be significantly favored to win the tournament. Hook one up with the 2 belts and garnish HEAVY following and viewing for the rest of the tourney - mo money for promoters
    5) A very good chance that Ward will win the tourney, so hook him up early

    To tell you the truth, im for the belt going to AA/Froch, then a Unification bout as the Finale
     
  13. ThePlugInBabies

    ThePlugInBabies ♪ ♫ Full Member

    8,673
    101
    Jan 27, 2007
    have these two even agreed to the details of their fight yet or are they still haggling over the location and whining about how they're too close as friends to possibly square off?
     
  14. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,465
    1,730
    Nov 20, 2007
    Absolutely, that'd be the ideal, logical, sane and deserved way, but these pullout rumors changed the whole script. We should thank Son of Grond and Dirrell for that.
     
  15. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    Aren't you the same guys who always claim "belts don't mean anything?":think