Moore and Rhodes to replace Nelson, Piper and McCrory...

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by NO MAS, Oct 16, 2010.


  1. NO MAS

    NO MAS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,784
    1
    Mar 2, 2009
    That's far more polite...:good

    I agree with your picks but Buncey and McGuigan together would be different... Woodhall and Buncey is a great mix too...:good
     
  2. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    0
    Sep 6, 2009
    woodhall would be quality, not so sure bout colin hart tho

    what is claud abrams up to these days :think
     
  3. Bad Dog

    Bad Dog Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    May 16, 2010
    You were ripping Bunce not long ago?
     
  4. portside

    portside Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,013
    0
    Feb 25, 2010
    im happy with that, but the bias bit is expecting a bit much, i noted moors reaction at end of programme, when they mentioned arron.;)
     
  5. stork

    stork Active Member Full Member

    808
    0
    Oct 18, 2008
    Moore and Rhodes were good tonight. would definately like to see them on more often. As for the original three, Nelson's worth keeping on but the other two need to go
     
  6. EnglishWay

    EnglishWay KO King 2010 Full Member

    3,685
    0
    Feb 14, 2010
    keep nelson with moore in there and then have a special guest every so often..
     
  7. high tower

    high tower Active Member Full Member

    835
    386
    Mar 27, 2008
    I wouldn't be too gutted about losing Piper and McCrory but Johnny Nelson is fantastic, v insightful, funny and easy to listen to.

    On a side note has anyone read Nelson book?
     
  8. gemmell100

    gemmell100 FREE K KOKE Full Member

    2,428
    0
    Aug 31, 2009
    sky cant handle buncey because he speaks his mind.
     
  9. gemmell100

    gemmell100 FREE K KOKE Full Member

    2,428
    0
    Aug 31, 2009
    colin hart just rambles on about ali and george foreman, he is a tosser.
     
  10. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    I did enjoy Moore's chat. But I really miss the sort of technical analysis someone like Tarver or Woodhall gives. Atlas, for his flaws, gives really good insight into why certain styles don't match up and what fighters can do to have more success.

    In the studio, they need more debate and less parroting.
     
  11. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Tarver is brilliant..... it was an odd choice for Showtime to get him on, but it's really paid off.

    In 20 years time people will probably forget that he ever boxed in his life :lol:
     
  12. NO MAS

    NO MAS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,784
    1
    Mar 2, 2009
    We know that... That's what makes him so appealing...:yep

    He asks the questions that others don't... Gets the fans, fighters, trainers and promoters all together and interactive... and Sky don't want to know...:nut

    They should run that risk, it's a managed risk, it will pay dividends...:deal

    Speculate to accumulate, the higher the risk, the higher the gain...:deal
     
  13. Scotty321

    Scotty321 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,516
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    He needs to stick to commentating. Friday was the worst Shobox I had seen in years thanks to him and his heavyweight crusade.
     
  14. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    0
    Sep 6, 2009
    over the month, what do u spend on boxing tv wise over there, does ur cable or whatever cover all the shows except ppv's :think