Are Klitschko's boring to fans because...

I'm coming around to your way of thinking my friend :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

briggs would murder tyson?

name me 3 top 5 guys shannon briggs has beaten in almost 60 pro fights...i beg of you? :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

people who dont like the Klitschkos and want them to lose to an American fighter call them boring or it's a weak era. It's the only criticism they can come up with. Some people are very displeased to see two Eastern Europeans laying some vicious beatings on the modern versions of the kindred spirits of Tyson Ali Holmes etc.

 

Not intending to be an ass but some of you really should learn how and when to put an apostrophe. I had to read the headline like six times until I figured out what you want.

 

As a fan who used to like Vitali and dislike Wladimir but now likes both as I take the feeling "all they do is win the best way they know how, so how can u not like these guys" I think many fans find them boring because of the slow style they bring...I'm talking from a fan friendly style standpoint I guess..

Wladimir controls opponents with his jabs...he lands hard shots but not really "big" shots which is what "oohhhss and aaaaahhhhhsssss" the fans....Vitali is a tad more fan friendly because his punches look krisp, strong, and thrown with bad intentions...I guess their styles mixed with the fact that they aren't American nor making a major move over here (like Lennox did but than again Lennox had Holyfield and Tyson to help build his name here) fans just dont like to see that style of fight...

I THOROUGHLY ENJOY WATCHING THE KLITSCHKOS THESE DAYS HOWEVER!

 

Playing it safe is the way