Problem is, once that is settled, the fixmaker will come up with a 60/40 revenue split demand in his favour 'cause the fight is on "his" soil - or some sort of similar rubbish.
"We're fighting in London, this is my hometown. I told the Klitschkos I am bringing London to the table, so I keep all the London ticket sales revenues, why should I share any gate revenues with those greedy *******s?"
The last offer to Haye was 50-50 of all revenues worldwide and no options no matter what the outcome. I think David Haye has a guaranteed 1.5 million against Harrison, while the Klitschkos consistently make at least 3 million in every fight. Haye doesn't have enough earning power outside of Great Britain to make over 3 million in a fight...against anyone but a Klitschko. You do the math... If they fight each other, the Klits & Haye are probably guaranteed at least 5-6 million each, if split evenly. The Klits are the ones to beat, the long time champs, are ready to fight anywhere to please Haye, therefore 50-50 including UK PPV money is common sense for non biased fans...
The latest deals that were offered to haye contained NO OPTIONS. Those are the facts. Why should the Klitschkos offer 50% of the "World Money" to Haye while Haye keeps all of the Brit TV money? The German TV money isn't the same because the fights are shown on FREE TV instead of the PPV that the gullible English public pays.................for **** fights like Haye vs. Harrison 50/50 No options means ALL THE MONEY GOES INTO THE POT & IT'S SPLIT DOWN THE MIDDLE. Haye can also pick which brother he wants to get Ko'd by..................
Oh ****, sorry unlike many of you posters i have neither the time or inspiration to look through another mans thread, such things are equivalent to sniffing mens y fronts. :hi: But you know what you did.
So now Davey Boy wants to keep all the Brit money...........:rofl........My guess is that Haye just flat out doesn't want to fight either Klitschko. :deal
Haye fought 2 times outside of Britain. Quite an achievement! On the other hand, Vitali has fought 5 times in the US and once in Britain and only once in Ukraine.
I wasnt aware of this, then again could you provide solid evidence where it is acknowledged by both sides rather than a crazed fanatic writer who has just quoted the Klits? I am not even a fan of Haye but itdoes not make business sense to give financiaql gain to one fighter just because they are the champion. if you make twice as much as a fighter how can you expect them to take equivalent.
Vitali said they'll do it where ever is the most money. The TV money will be the same every where so surely it'll be in the UK as that's where they'll get more cash for arses on seats. There'd be strong interest in Germany but nothing like what they'd get in the UK.
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/s...0-split-to-tempt-haye-into-ring-15005129.html http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/boxing/9192282.stm Klitschkos can't make 6 million fighting anyone else but Haye, but on the other hand, they still make more fighting anyone else than Haye makes doing the same... The Klits agree to 50-50 to get that highest payday, to have the chance to unify all the belts and to make sure the fight happens without any possible legit excuses.