who is your number three and why?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Langford, Nov 27, 2007.


  1. joe33

    joe33 Guest

    Does the rather dodgy way liston lost in the rematch against ali not mark him down for some of you guys?
    I mean some fighters on here get knocked like wlad for having no heart,yet people seem to be willying to let this shocking loss go,why is that?,he to me anyway threw the fight clear as day,and mafia involvement or not,he losses a lot of respect from me for it.

    By the way i have got louis at 3 for me,i love this man,and i personaly think he would have giving ali complete hell,maybe even winning it,my top 6 is thus

    1 Ali
    2 Marciano
    3 Louis
    4 dempsey
    5 Jeffries
    6 Holmes
     
  2. radianttwilight

    radianttwilight Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,539
    18
    May 5, 2007
    I'm fairly convinced that both, if not just the second, Ali-Liston fights were fixes, so it doesn't hurt my opinion on his legacy. Either way, the Liston that fought Ali was nowhere close to the guy that destroyed Patterson, Machen, etc.

    About the "Holmes as #3" issue - I'm not sure about him, either. His second career, similar to Foreman's, boosts my opinion of him highly, though.

    Holmes was fairly competitive in the 1990s, FAR past his prime. However much he "struggled" with guys like Snipes and Witherspoon, at least he beat them. He didn't let them KHTFO, at least :D

    The Vitali fight totally undermines any thoughts I have of Lewis being a top-tier ATG. One of the very few times he fought a guy that he didn't have both a clear stylistic advantage (slow guys, overrated guys, light punchers) and a size advantage (pretty much everyone), he arguably was losing before that TKO. He was old, and he did win, but if the SHELL of Tyson he fought and a relatively green Vitali could do that to Lewis...

    I rate him more highly than guys like Dempsey and Johnson, though. That's for sure. My "contenders" for the #3 spot are Liston, Tyson, Foreman, Marciano, Holmes, and Lewis. All of them have a pretty good claim - each one of them has at least one major flaw in their resume, so it's a close call.
     
  3. True Writer

    True Writer Active Member Full Member

    640
    5
    Mar 2, 2007
    I cant beleive people ar picking Liston, the man was an enigma like Tyson but to a lesser degree. I can't see how you can rate a fighter so highly that was involved in fixes and never really achieved too much - he is a myth whose staus has been built up over time.

    I disagree with Ali & Louis at 1 & 2 I actually think Lennox Lewis is probably the greatest ever heavyweight head to head.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,960
    27,928
    Feb 15, 2006
    My top 20

    1. Joe Louis
    2. Muhamad Ali
    3. Jack Johnson
    4. Jim Jeffries
    5. Jack Dempsey
    6. Rocky Marciano
    7. Sonny Liston
    8. Lenox Lewis
    9. Sam Langford
    10. Joe Frazier

    11. Larry Holmes
    12. Harry Wills
    13. Mike Tyson
    14. George Foreman
    15. Evander Hollyfield
    16. Jim Corbett
    17. Joe Walcott
    18. Max Schmeling

    19. Ezzard Charles
    20. Bob Fitzsimmons
     
  5. Nick Balsamo

    Nick Balsamo Member Full Member

    343
    5
    Feb 20, 2006
    Your # 14 would KTFO your # 5-6-9-10-12 and 13. And he could beat a lot of others ranked in front of him... how strange is that ?:admin
     
  6. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,090
    27,435
    Jan 3, 2007
    This list is fine up until about #2, then it pretty much goes to hell. having Sam Langford rated ahead of Frazier, Holmes, Tyson, Foreman and Holyfield???? Sheeezzz :patsch
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,960
    27,928
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,960
    27,928
    Feb 15, 2006
    There is the little matter of Langfords resume. He did beat all the top heavyweights of his period up to a dozen times.