Who beat AA more convincingly?

You need to take a look in the rule book. A forearm shove that sends the opponent into the ropes is no knockdown.

 

Dirrell - intellect? Nah mate, think you have the wrong man. Dirrell is thick as pig ****. Did you not see his "interview" on fight camp? The guy is a drip.

 

yea ok.

 

Froch did but i did say at the very start of the competition that AA would be Frochs easiest fight because styles make fights and Froch struggles with movement and speed. Which AA doesnt have.

 

Abraham was ROBBED ! Nah seriously, froch ****ed him up, Dirrell out boxed him but was sure to get KO'd if the fight continued, even if he didnt sucker punch him while he was on the ground.

 

Froch. End thread

 

Yea having the ability to study, time, and have the opponent at a constant disadvatage indicates a boxer thick as pig ****. So by this same logic Floyd Mayweather, Pernell Whitaker and Ezzard Charles were also mental midgets in the boxing ring? Either that or you're a biased hater.

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fztqCbOUiTY[/ame]

This is hardly Mayweather , Whitaker or Charles.

give it up , you neither have the intellect on boxing or any other relevant subject to put up a good argument.

 

Would you really compare Dirrell to the guys you mention above?

Dirrell has proven nothing - other than he can take advantage of a more or less static opponent and that he can act, in order to get the job done.

 

Froch IMO

 

I know that Dirrell hasn't won ****. I feel all fighters I mentioned were vastly superior tacticians for their era albeit much more accomplished. I'm not comparing them all time or anything silly like that because Dirrell did'nt have much time. And here we are the guy will never ****ing fight again and you're calling him an actor. It's really amazing dumbasses like you roam the earth.

 

''I'm still clueless on the point'' :cry:

:rofl

If he doesn't know why a point was taken he needs to either read the rules or watch the fight.

The ref probably did Froch a favour by waiting so long to deduct a point, because it only gave Dirrell a couple of rounds to up the ante.

I was in the arena and can honestly say that by the time the point was taken Dirrell should probably have been thrown out. A point deduction in the first three rounds would have been perfectly fair.

 

Froch, and clearly.

Abraham was coming on strong against Dirrell and scored a legitimate knockdown that the ref failed to score. Although he was miles behind, Abraham was chasing Dirrell around the ring and him scoring another kd, or better, wasn't out of the question.

There wasn't a single moment where you thought Froch was in danger of losing a round, never mind the fight.

 

AA won a few rounds against Dirrell. He didn't win 1 against Froch. End thread.

 

froch