Brook.defo the best boxer n finisher since naz,,,khan is very very dangrous but,,is khan better than naz?????????
Khan wrote on Twitter: "Been speaking to kel brook. He also admits its hyped by the papers. We both agree in the future it wud be a fight but not just yet, anyway good luck to him. All cleared up and twitter to no 1st. " Translation: "Been speaking to Kell Brook. He also admit's it's been hyped by the papers. We both agree in the future, it would be a fight, but not just yet. Anyway good luck to him. All cleared up. Twitter to know first."
Khan would ****in destroy Brook in the pros and am's. Brook should shut the **** up and fight somebody who can actually punch back.
I agree, the way he dispensed with Mcintyre showed the world who Kell Brook is. The only question is, was the world watching?
its been annoying me lately with all this 'khan should fight, katsidis, marquez, brook' shite! nobody wants to see khan fight blown up lightweights or an unproven welter when bradley and alexander is already signed, khan being undisputed at his weight is there on a plate for him! if your reading this amir please fight the winner of bradley/alexander, it makes sense.
Khan will fight the winner of Alexander and Bradley. But before he does, he wants a tune-up fight in the UK. Once that's out of the way, he'll then attempt to unify.
Bradley vs Alexander is at the end of January so there is obviously opportunity for Khan to fight someone else before the winner of that one.