...yeah, same :huh to be fair to him, ive not seen any of his career from first time round but ive seen nowt to suggest he could win this
The two things we know about Frenkel is he is very durable and has a very big punch so it doesnt bode well but best of luck! Would be good if he can pull it of
this man who may have lost every round to enzo, wasent 'trying to win rnds, he's seen what happens to foreighn boxers who win rounds on suoerland shows? he came with the artillery and the intent to make sure he diden't suffer the same fate here.:think:good
Hopefully most of it seeing as I was there. Also watched a play back when Fwank put it up. So yeah I have seen the fight.
Your reading comprehension needs some work. How much of Frenkel have you seen apart from the Maccarinelli bout?
Sorry its late. Seen only the stuff on youtube simms etc. I thought he was poor against enzo and he definately tired. Enzo gave him his chin on a plate at the end. You seriously think Frenkle could last with Huck or Lebvedev?
Huck and Lebedev are arguably two of the top 3 cruiserweights. He's not fighting Huck or Lebedev, he's fighting forty ****ing two year-old Terry 'Dropped by a light-heavy in a 3 round bout recently' Dunstan.
Your judging Dunstan off one fight, like you were saying I was doing of Frenkle. We'll have to agree to disagree. Remember I never said he would win, I said he could win.
TBF he's a young 42 and I've heard other pro's say he is the fittest boxer they know. Plus, since his comeback he has been steadily improving.
There's a big difference between beating a journeyman like Micky Steeds though and Frenkel. Even though he might be flattered a bit by the win over Enzo, who was arguably ahead at the time of the KO. Just looked on Boxrec he's down to fight Fragomeni in Germany in February :think
Not that big of a difference between a top domestic operator and a good European operator though And I would trust Will's word over Boxrec :good