Question for the Irish posters....

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by ApatheticLeader, Jan 14, 2011.


  1. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    Do you think Collins was a better fighter than Eubank and Benn? If so, why?
     
  2. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008
    at middleweight? Probably neither

    Super middle - without sounding churlish, because he beat both?
     
  3. Big Dunk

    Big Dunk Rob Palmer Full Member

    13,522
    0
    Oct 25, 2010
    He beat both end of story really.
     
  4. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    I'm waiting for one of the Irish posters to come up with something concrete and logical in regards to this. Having beaten both (especially Benn) is a poor argument.
     
  5. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    8,170
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    This content is protected
     
  6. Big Dunk

    Big Dunk Rob Palmer Full Member

    13,522
    0
    Oct 25, 2010
    surley having beaten both is the most logical and fair arguement. Not only did he beat them but he did it twice for each.
     
  7. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    Not really, considering Benn was genuinely past it for both fights and the first Collins/Eubank fight is disputable. Besides, even if Benn/Eubank were in their prime, doesn't actually mean Collins is the better fighter. The vast majority of great fighters have been beaten by inferior fighters at some point in their careers - whether it was due to being past their prime, the opponent being a stylistic nightmare or just a plain bad night at the office.
     
  8. Pa_nash

    Pa_nash Member Full Member

    478
    0
    Feb 20, 2009
    I've seen threads on here where Eubank is hailed as one of Calzaghe's finest wins. Didn't Collins beat him twice before then? Can't have it both ways. Eubank still had a lot to offer then, Benn not so much.
     
  9. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    It is one of Calzaghe's best win, due to the lack of depth on his resumé, not because Eubank was that good.
     
  10. Pa_nash

    Pa_nash Member Full Member

    478
    0
    Feb 20, 2009
    I think Eubank still had a lot to offer by the time he fought Calzaghe, nevermind Collins.

    You clearly rate Collins lower than Benn and Eubank, why don't you lead by example and come up with something concrete and logical as to why you take the contrary view.
     
  11. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    Very wrong, I'm one of the few non-Irish posters who thinks that Collins is superior to both Benn and Eubank. I'm just fed up of hearing that Collins is better than Benn and Eubank based on their fights - which is all the Irish contingent seem to come up with.
     
  12. Droog

    Droog Member Full Member

    275
    0
    Nov 1, 2007
    I’m not Irish but I have changed my opinion on this over the years. At first I was always of the opinion that Collins was slightly inferior and just caught them both at the right time when Eubank was on a punishing fight schedule and Benn was shot.

    Now though I believe Collins would have beaten Eubank regardless. I just think Collins had Eubanks number and although they were closely matched, Collins had the edge.

    As for Benn he was clearly shot as a fighter for both of his Collins fights and any attempt to claim otherwise does him a disservice. But I now think had Collins met Benn in his prime the result might have still been a Collins victory? Maybe they would have taken one apiece or had a draw?

    Either way after re-watching a few of the old 90’s fights of all three fighters this past few months Collins has gone up in my estimation. I always rated Collins but generally below both Eubank and Benn. I now have him above Eubank and equal or just edging Benn.

    All three of them were great fighters though. It is easy to forget just how much I hated Eubank back then though. Watching the old fights brought all that back for a bit lol. I think I warmed to him when he had the fights with Thompson even though he lost and I always liked the “Cat”.

    Collins is underrated as a top super middleweight I feel and it is easy to just call him a tough brawler (as I did previously) who caught certain fighters at the right time. He was definitely avoided in the division during his peak years.
     
  13. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,275
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
    Collins beat a completely shot Benn. If you cant see that watch another sport.
    He was also lucky in the first fight against Eubank who I felt won clearly.

    Against that he apparently gave Eubank a right thumping in the rematch and also had some very good wins over Tony Thornton and Kevin 'Killer' Watts. I also felt he gave Reggie Johnson fits when they fought.
    I rank them pretty close together with Collins onso closely behind as to not really be worth arguing about. The one thing that annoys me however is that people still somehow consider the Benn fights relavent.
    They were not. This isn't an oppinion its a statement of fact. If you dissagree watch another sport.
     
  14. supremo

    supremo Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,765
    14
    Oct 15, 2009
    The Irish belive Collins was better because they share the same Island. Was Calzaghe a better fighter than RJJ?
     
  15. Max Banjo

    Max Banjo Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,199
    0
    Jun 10, 2010
    Cue SBW to Slabber that Benn and Eubank were both better than Collins:deal