Froch vs Calzaghe @ 168 who wins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by pacpowerpellet, Feb 11, 2011.


  1. the quiet man

    the quiet man Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,554
    1
    Apr 20, 2010
    whatever froch go's on to achieve, lets not fool ourselfs into thinking he would have beaten calzaghe. joe would have slapped him silly.
     
  2. Hoshi

    Hoshi bigboi Full Member

    1,074
    1
    May 2, 2010
    This, definitely.
     
  3. horst

    horst Guest

    :huh Since when did Calzaghe become remotely difficult to hit???

    I think that if Sakio Bika can take Calzaghe into the 117-109/116-111 range on the cards, then Froch will be more than capable of exceeding that.

    Froch's jab, aggression, drive and power will trouble Calzaghe.

    I'll back Calzaghe's speed to see him take a decision 116-112 or something like that, but to imply it would be another Calzaghe-Lacy is silly.
     
  4. hellblazer

    hellblazer All-Time Greatâ„¢ Full Member

    5,509
    0
    Feb 25, 2006
  5. Kingkazim

    Kingkazim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,806
    12
    Aug 26, 2009
    read my previous posts you idiot. A TKO like what Froch did to Taylor was a whupping

    you clearly havent been reading the thread properly :patsch
     
  6. The_President

    The_President Boxing Addict banned

    6,126
    1
    Apr 22, 2010
    Close enough <= :yep
     
  7. The_President

    The_President Boxing Addict banned

    6,126
    1
    Apr 22, 2010
    What Hopkins actually said is that he fought Calzaghe using the wrong strategy, and in the rematch he would fight using a offensive versus defensive posture. Next fight, he showed us what he meant against Kelly Pavlik. :yep
     
  8. kolokomandos

    kolokomandos GLASS IS NOT AN OPTION Full Member

    2,284
    1
    Aug 11, 2010
  9. Abdullah

    Abdullah Boxing Junkie banned

    8,257
    14
    Dec 2, 2008
    Calzaghe, of course.
     
  10. stevo78

    stevo78 Active Member Full Member

    1,240
    0
    Apr 27, 2009
    wot ee sed
     
  11. El Terrible

    El Terrible Active Member Full Member

    715
    0
    Apr 26, 2010
    Calzaghe UD unfortunately.
     
  12. horst

    horst Guest

    This fight would look more like Calzaghe-Reid than it would Calzaghe-Lacy.
     
  13. lewishamboy

    lewishamboy Styles Impetuous Full Member

    9,101
    0
    Jul 15, 2007
    At last someones chatting some sense in this thread
     
  14. lewishamboy

    lewishamboy Styles Impetuous Full Member

    9,101
    0
    Jul 15, 2007
    Yeah of course noone knew who Froch was, especially after his win over Pascal broadcast on ITV. Muppet.
     
  15. RobertV77

    RobertV77 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,001
    4
    Apr 7, 2010

    I don't think he is as dumb as he looks. A cave man like Froch doesn't get as far as he has being stupid. I think he would be dangerous for twelve rounds with Calzaghe given Slappys lack of fundamentals, poor defense, and the fact that Calzaghe was largely unproven against fighters of Froch's pedigree. This is fundamentally an academic question considering Calzaghe is retired and would have dodged Froch for how ever long it took to avoid ever fighting him.