The Mayweather/Hatton fight was more memorable and entertaining, the Cott/Mosely fight was more competitive.
I voted cotto mosley but i think they were both even. even tho I could easily say i liked them both just as much.
Cotto v Mosley was more competetive fight all in all i'de say.. But at the same time PBF v Hatton was a hell of a fight to watch technically and is more memorable..
Cotto vs Mosely the better fight. But Floyd vs Hatton the better, more decisive finish. At the end of the day I like that as a boxing fan. No 45+ threads to read about robbery, etc.
Cotto/Mosley was way more balanced. Mayweather/Hatton had more emotion to it and more defining moments.
I voted Cotto/Mosley, but really I liked them both equally, but there's no choice for "both were good". Cotto/Mosley was so good because both fighters were landing clean shots and it was more competitive. Hatton was dominated, but it was still fun to watch.
Much more was landing in Cotto-Mosley, but their was much more at stake in Mayweather-Hatton. PBF-Hatton was BETTER
To me its not even close, Cotto-Mosley was FAR more exciting. Good two way action with both fighters stunned at times. The fight was hanging in the balance going into the 12th. We also saw both fighters have to change game plans to adapt and overcome. Where as the Mayweather-Hatton fight involved the referee doing a lot of unneccessary warning and breaks. Also very little sustained action between both fighters and very few clean shots landed by one fighter (Hatton).
Floyd Hatton was a mess hatton all he did was run inside and hold great job by Floyd but Hatton looked like a bum Cotto-Mosley was more entertaining to me
