There may be some level of truth there but at the same time a bit unfair. Couture is a freak of nature, and Lesnar since his operation is already (IMO) showing signs of slipping. Most athletes, generally speaking, do not perform the way they once did at 34 years of age. Just because science has created athletes that have staved off father time and performed amazingly at advanced ages deoesnt mean every athlete should. And that goes for Fedor.
he fought matt lindland for crying out loud robbly lawler just koed him faster than fedor. give me a break the man is great but way overrated bc of his competition level that he has fought against in the last many years. he should have been praised years ago when he was smashing guys but the last several years its all been smoke bc he hasn't fought any of the top competition. brett rogers a cook almost koed him infact he smashed him in the first round. if he would have been training instead of cooking he mostlikely would have got it done.
I wouldn't have Randy any where near the top 5. His best body of work was down at 205 not heavy. That said i dont think Kerr should be ranked above Mark Coleman either. Coleman's early career was far more significant than Mark ever achieved.