Andre Ward has not lost a fight since 1998

ahem, Froch / Dirrell

 

Exposed? To be honest, your interpretation of "being exposed" is quite unique as I've never seen anyone consider every loss equal to being exposed.

Again, what's that exposed-thing you're talking about? Miranda and Green proved to be only B minus level and he beat them in the manner he should. Due to a lack of power he didn't KO either of them but what difference would that have made? And would you rate these wins if he was the one "exposing" (=defeating) Miranda and Green first?

Yeah he didn't. You gotta admit Bika's quite an uncomfortable boxer to fight against. In fact, I think he's quite good, even better than Abraham. The fact that he lost to Bute and Calzaghe doesn't say much. Losing against two excellent SMWs hardly equals an exposure and if I remember correctly Bika was somewhat competitive.

No need to be defensive on British boxers because I'm a Froch fan too and I don't hold a grudge against Calzaghe. Kessler was beaten by one of the arguably best 168er in history and there's no shame in it, is it? Regarding that blueprint thing I'm not sure if I can follow you. Ward fights nothing like Calzaghe and beat him with his own style and hardly ever lost a trade of punches.

An interesting approach of trying to prove that Kessler really is an invalid and was only able to beat Froch because of eh...travelling and um..ear problems.

Dude, srsly that's not the point. Except Abraham no former nor future Ward opponent has been "exposed". Kessler, Bika and Miranda were beaten bei A level boxer which simply happens. Fine, Miranda and Green proved to be B minus but Kessler and Bika fared rather fine whenever they stepped in the ring with high profile boxers like Calzaghe, Bute, Froch and so on.

Hey you're from UK, English is your mother tongue so you should be aware of the definition of "being exposed". It means not being decent to begin with and would you characterize Kessler as such? And please don't get me started on that double-vision thing.

 

You said prime Jones or SMW Jones. I didnt. I said prime Kessler would have no probs with Jones, and that Jones who got KOd by Johnson and Tarver would be no problem for Kessler. I also said Kessler would have to go up to LHW.
So why are YOU trying to twist what was written :huh

 

So why do you think Kessler would have a problem with that so called version?

 

The Ring magazine and Boxing News both scored for Froch. Remember that

 

Can you not read???atsch

Are you gonna answer or what??? I'm not about to do this **** with you..either you answer or shut the **** up! Quite simple!

 

:good

 

I agree with this. He seems like he was a lot more sloppy and wild years back. Even if it he was the same fighter isn't equate to Calzaghe & Bute > Ward based on this one common opponent. I hate to repeat it but styles make fights. They are both southpaws, for instance, and maybe that was part of the trouble. I can guarantee that Bute would have a harder time against Kessler then Ward did.

 

Have you started the thread yet then bottle job.
This thread is about Ward yet you want to talk about Jones atsch.
So are you going to grow some balls and start the thread??

 

Thats all fine and dandy but are you gonna answer the question or not?

 

Thats all fine and dandy but are you gonna start the thread or not? Remember you are asking me questions irrellevent to this thread atsch, so start the thread, or are you a complete bottle job???

 

His last two performances have left a lot to be desired.

 

Precisely "force"

If he beats someone good , fairly and without has family as judges I'll buy it.

 

:rofl try telling froch that :yep froch is the man at 168 definatley