not sure if he's right about this but i do believe he would give them a very good fight. [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcMeDctD_60[/ame]
Dwyer is smoking some good weed. I get sick listening to say "quite frankly" and "today" over and over again in every sentence.
This guy has had consistently bad picks of late. He's blind he thought Solis would school Vitali. That Foreman would beat Cotto. That a washed up Jones would beat Calzaghe. Yes; these were his picks. He aint that smart. I have a better pick ratio than him - **** this guy couldn't even pick Abraham or Froch!
yeah that comment does undermine his views on degale a bit. m,indf you i havn't seen that much of solomon so i couldn't realy say.
Agreed. And why does he now fill out his 10-15 minute videos with 50% waffle before finally breaking down a fight?
He's overselling DeGale quite a bit, and I have big expectations from Chunky. There are several issues to resolve, defense, footwork, 'slapping', James should improve in these areas before me thinking he could beat elite SMWs, and fighting an A or even B level guy is also necessary to see how far his current skills take him as the opposition gets tougher. I do feel Chunky will go all the way and possibly beyond, but in years not in weeks.
You've got it messed up son, you think he's sitting there deciding who he thinks will win. He's not he's trying to play the bookies to make money, it's totally different. If you watch how often the man actually loses money, it's not often at all.
his footwork and defence are very good. didn't see any problems vs smith. i think degale is the type of fighter that gets better with every fight. he's so measured and presise with his work but also explosive when he throws combos. all he needs is an opening and he landssome awesome shots. groves is tailor made for him and you'll see what dwyer was talking about.
Is the desperate attempt of dwyer of *CONSTANTLY* picking the long-shot, underdog type of opponents and arguing how they're 50/50 and toss-ups. He obviously hopes to get just one of these huge upsets right and then he can run his mouth with "TOLD YOU SO".
Straddling your bet is a copy out unless the odds are really really good. Example: You put $1500 on a fighter to win for a $400 profit. You beat that $400 on the other guy by KO to win $1500. He talks about covering his bets but then consider if neither happens. That's a lot of money to loose and if you bet loose because you're straddling your winnings are paltry.
dwyers studied boxing like a mad man, I remember him picking ward to be a superstar before the miranda fight I was thinking who the %%%% is this guy, I remember him talking about canelo alvarez 2 years ago again wtf?, i remember him being the only guy at the time to pick margarito over cotto, martinez over williams in the first, hopkins over pavlik, Pirog over danny jacob, froch being a stud before the pascal fight, ward over kesslar, but usually his page is mainly for 'gamblers advisory' and how to bet with the guarantee of not losing any money throug straddles, it's garbage though I dont gamble and never will
He also said Margarito will KO Pacquiao, Pavlik and Dzinzi.. will beat Martinez, Dawson is the best boxer ever and he will have no problems vs Pascal, Solis will beat Klitschko etc.. If you use dices you will have more success at predicting boxing matches then he has! Haha!