why is it when a heavyweight is at 220lbs or below, people automatically say he's

Brewster's win is a win, period, no matter who was taking a beating or how, what matters is the result. It seems like you are the one making it complicated.

The guys they were fighting were actually at a muscular weight of 220+ thus they were actually bigger than today's 250+ behemoths..

Let me make it very clear for you, Joe Louis at his prime weight of 205lbs is bigger than fat ass Arreola at 260lbs, this point cannot be argued if you know your fitness and how body composition works.

 

so many of you obsess over the #s on the scale when you just dont get a simple point.

Today's generation of heavyweights didnt get bigger, they got lazier and fatter. Many of you dont realize how hard it is for a man to be 240+ pounds and be in good shape. That's why i listed guys like Klits as exceptions.

Majority of the other heavies are just fat slobs who have 40-50 pounds of FAT to lose.

How hard is this to understand.

 

arguement is simple.

if you're in good shape, and can see slight definition in your ab region and you're in the territory of 200-210lbs you are at no disadvantage against someone who weighs 260 but has sagging belly and D Cup tits which majority of today's heavyweights have acquired through rigorous training regimen and strict caloric intake.

 

It's not that simple, you'd have to evaluate them on individual talents, their strengths and weaknesses, quite a few of those guys on the list wouldnt have the puncher's chance. If i were to match any one of them head to head against a Klitschko obviously id favour the brothers over all of them.

but that's not the point, i just dont see anyone big or small who would pose a threat to Klit bros at this moment. AND IF in some distant future, there is a potential Klit beater coming out of the woodwork, he doesnt necessairly have to be 6'5 250+ adonis.

this has nothing to do with size now, to me klitchko is just a tough guy to beat period, whether you big or small you'll have a hard time with him. I wouldnt pick anyone on that list against wlad just the same way i wouldnt pick them over a much smaller tyson.

this is a situation where you're dealing with a future ATG and not just a big strong guy.

 

exactly, listen, there are some lethal people in the world who weigh 160 and would put someone like Wlad in a bodybag with a single blow.

just because we dont hear about them, or just because they dont have a pro boxing license, it doesnt mean they dont exist. Size does not limit one's strength or capability.

Majority of fans are used to seeing freak show fat asses rub against each other and tire after throwing a few soft jabs, that's why their mind cannot conceive the fact that there are serious people walking this earth.

i repeat size does not limit your performance provided you are in physical shape and have a weapon of some sort.

 

not really. they say that about every heavyweight who doesnt meat today's weight standards lol

they said the same thing about boytsov, eventhough he's undefeated. But as long as Klitschko is the champ denis wont become a champ, not because he's a small guy, but because he's an idiot who allows his management team to babysit him like a newborn baby.

 

there are bigger guys, but dennis seems to be physically more capable, good handspeed, power, agressive style. his problem is his opposition, guys like him wont get far precisely for that reason.