Im convinced Mayweather would beat Pacquiao just like Morales or worst

I'm just wondering, they kept watching Pac fight 4, 5, 10 years ago and say that it is still relevant. But Mosley, Cotto, Hatton, Margarito of JUST 1 - 2 years isn't.

 

thats because in the mind of boxing fans when you lose youre shot and whoever beats you then doesnt get credit. I guess we shouldnt give hagler credit for knocking out hearns since leonard already did it as well?

 

We have void chickens now. Daiumn

 

As if people don't still bring up the Castillo fight from 9 years even though Floyd won.

 

Floyd gave Castillo the rematch and Floyd hand still was race he put on a boxing clinic. Watch the first or second Marquez vs Pacquiao fight or watch the Morales and Pacquiao fight and tell me after watching it. What Morales did Floyd cant do better. Pacquiao style hasn't really change that much except now for some reason these big guys fold when he hits them and for some unknown reason he doesnt really get hurt or tired. I think its that A-side meth tell Pacquiao to take the test and his ass is kick. Like Roy Jones told Bernard Hopkins 60-40 and your ass is kicked

 

That's probably the weakest nickname for Floyd I've seen yet. No wonder where your 30k posts came from with posts as intellectually stimulating as this.

Also Morales fights absolutely nothing like Floyd and the way he beat Pacquiao was through well timed aggressive flurries and good old fashioned headbutt. Watching Morales beat Pacquiao is by no means a blueprint for how to beat him. When was the last time you saw Mayweather take 4 punches then rush across the ring at his opponent flinging hooks?

 

exactly!!
If *******s can bring up Castillo, then we can bring up Morales which was more recent

 

atsch And you're both equally ****in stupid for bringing up pointless ****.

 

Hey dumbass. Did I even post in this thread before that post. Please ****off. The thread is about Morales and I was replying to a post abouy Mayweather vs Castillo and comparing it to the thread topic. I didn't bring up ****
:nutcase
There's other people in his thread. Go argue with them

 

Mayweather is a lot smarter and morales is the blueprint to beat Pacquiao all u have to do like Morales and Marquez is use the jab and counter his bull **** and soon he will start thinking and when he does that against Mayweather the fight is over

 

You are crazy man! Morales never beat Pacquiao! I scored the fight for Pacquiao and Mayweather is too chicken to fight Pacquiao anyways.

 

I personally rate Morales higher than Floyd as an ATG anyway, Pacquiao is a different animal. Morales had one last great performance left in him, and he pulled it out that night. :rasta

 

atsch So, you're still saying the same dumb **** they are. Makes you the same...

 

Since you bought up Castillo Explain this Fight 1 referee: Vic Drakulich | judge: Anek Hongtongkam 116-111 | judge: John Keane 115-111 | judge: Jerry Roth 115-111 Fight 2 referee: Joe Cortez | judge: Ken Morita 115-113 | judge: Larry O'Connell 116-113 | judge: Daniel Van de Wiele 115-113 Jr clearly won the second fight Explain the scoring in the first.

 

and what would that be? All I'm saying is, if the Morales fight is too old to bring up, then so is the Castillo fight :bart

The score was too wide in the first fight and could have even been a split or majority decision to Floyd, but the second fight was too close also. Either way the best man won