which is weird as they have some brits on the panel The Ring Rating Panel Mark Abrams Carlos Arias Eric Armit Bill Calogero Nick Charles Brian Doogan Coyote Duran J. Michael Falgoust Steve Farhood Doug Fischer Margaret Goodman, M.D. Lee Groves Jack Hirsch Michael Hirsley Keith Idec Carlos Irusta Ted Lerner Marc Lichtenfeld Jessi Losado Scott Mallon Rich Marotta David Mayo Barry McGuigan Marty Mulcahey Bernard Osuna Vittorio Parisi Matt Richardson Cliff Rold Michael Rosenthal Rick Scharmberg Don Steinberg Joe Tessitore Paul Upham Claude Vesque Calvin Watkins John Whistler Phil Woolever Kurt Wolfheimer
They can't be consulting them then. How does Murray put in a performance like that and leap above Acosta?
Having been one of Aguacerito's biggest fans for a few years, I can safely say he would molest Murray if they ever fought.
But Acosta is till much more proven and has by far the better wins. Guerrero's win over Escobedo is way better than anything on Murray's record. Vazquez has better wins as well. Do you honestly believe John Murray's the 5th best lightweight in the world?
no honestly i would rank him towards the lower end of the top ten.i am trying to figure out a reason for his ranking.it must be the undefeated record i mean usually their rankings they are quite good
Can't argue with that :good. Murray at 9 or 10 is perfectly acceptable. In the last 18-24months the rankings have being a bit weird. Before they were more or less spot on but atm I don't know what's up with them.
yeah their champions and top 3 or 4 are spot on but their top ten can be odd lhw is puzzling.also the site has become a bit of gbp infomercial lately