Is anyone else tired of...

You're missing the point and need to look deeper into the issue. Not every American fighter that loses is a hype job. Some weren't hyped to begin with, whilst others are generally very highly regarded and as such a loss does not diminish their standing too much as their legacy is already assured. eg Hopkins, Taylor,Roy Jones

The point is that we have seen a whole conveyor belt of US fighters who have been hyped by US tv(and as a logical extention the armchair fans) who are simply not as good as you've been led to believe. HBO bought the most expensive advertising slot IN THE TV WORLD( half time at the Superbowl) to hype up Jeff Lacy and many were claiming he was the second coming of Mike Tyson and would lift US boxing from the doldrums. And yet against a fighter hitherto derided by US pundits and fans, he lost every minute of every round.

There are countless other examples of US fighters who have not reached the heights many expected and predicted of them. This is the point....not just that they lost a fight which is something that happens to nearly fighters. Note that no one says Tim Bradley is a hypejob because he's not lauded by the US press and tv(a therefore by defination the public) as the second coming of Ray Leonard, and yet most boxing fans acknowledge that he is a very very good fighter.

Just look at how Victor Ortiz is being RE-hyped And you will seen a poll on here where the majority of Americans think he will beat Amir Khanatsch Now of course it IS possible he will beat Khan, but all the boxing evidence would suggest that he won't, and yet people are buying the hype once again.

Froch and Khan aren't really good examples as they have both rebounded from their defeats with victories to put them back at the top of the tree. A good example of a British hypejob would be Frank Bruno who the British public and press still thought was a world beater long after it was known in boxing circles that he wasn't. Other examples might include Alex Arthur and Kevin Mitchell who both turned out to be nowhere near as good as predicted

 

I am tired of european butt holes who always have something to say about a american fighter and i am tired of american fighters who always praise any fighter who aren't white or black americans

 

I don't know of David UK, but I've seen Bailey post and he is the most biased cretin on this forum for sure. He and his chums are obsessed with promoting white European fighters at the expense of black American fighters, that's all they ever seem to do.

The cretin even suggested the other day that ZSOLT ERDEI was kept out of the p4p top 10 by The Ring magazine due to bias!!!

You just have to laugh at these weirdos and their creepy agendas. lol:lol:

If Carl Froch was a black American, they'd say he was a plodder with no skills and no defence.

If Chad Dawson was a white Brit, they'd say he was the silkiest, most skilful fighter on the planet.

They're cretins from another century. Hopefully the mods wake up one day and decide to ban people like that.

 

How the hell does "all the boxing evidence" suggest that Khan would beat Ortiz??! Because of their contrasting performances against one fighter, Maidana? You don't understand boxing at all if that's the case. "All the boxing evidence" suggests no such thing.

atsch

 

The evidence is threefold.

1) Khan beat a fighter Ortiz lost to. I know that doesn't GUARANTEE a Khan win , but it's a useful from guide

2) Ortiz is known for quitting when in really hard fights, and this will be a hard fight.

3) Khan has already beaten Ortiz, indeed stopped him quite easily.

Again, none of these facts guarantee a Khan win, and Ortiz is a good fighter, but anyone seriously analyising this match up MUST favour Khan due to the above which is a more reliable form guide than simply nationality

 

:|:|:| Shut the **** up you girly tranny queen. You sound like a nagging wife after her drunk husband has come in and tripped over the bacofoil, thus spoiling her carefully prepard Sunday roast. :roflatsch

 

Dawson and Pavlik, you haven't picked the best examples for your laughable crusade here doctor jones.

Two of the biggest overhyped yankee hypejobs in recent memory.

Next in line for exposure: Andre son of goat Ward

The only difference is the non americans can see the ridiculous overhyping from a mile away and call it like we see it. Whilst the dumbyanks do what they do best and lap it all up, then cry like a ***** with a grazed knee (see OP) when it all comes tumbling down.

 

:nono

 

Ameri-bum hype job yanks.

No one is safe from the wrath of King Khan!

 

Where they are from has nothing to do with it. This is how it has always been with fans in boxing, whoever loses is immediately a hypejob even if the hype has only been on the internet.

 

Because Khan also TKO'd him in the amatuers WITH HEAD GEAR.