Sugar Ray Robinson's Defence - Rate it out of 10

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by TG1, May 2, 2011.


  1. Englund

    Englund Warrior Full Member

    2,545
    3
    Feb 17, 2010
    6.5 He wasn't too that hard to hit. He made up for it with other attributes, but he was definitely hittable. That's what made him so exciting.
     
  2. Rexrapper 1

    Rexrapper 1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,596
    726
    Aug 23, 2010
    6-7 out of 10. Def wasn't a defensive wizard.
     
  3. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    Yeah, 6 is about right. His footwork was his primary line of defense, really. Well, that and his offense.
     
  4. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    from what I've seen he seemed to have a solid defense. Rolled and picked off shots . He wasn't no pernell whitaker or anything, but it was solid by those standards back then.
     
  5. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,168
    10,612
    Jul 28, 2009
    I think your 7/10 is quite fair, TG. 8-10 would be elite, 5 would be leaky but fair, 7 would be strongly skilled but a cut under the best, the way I'd look at it.
     
  6. Slickstar

    Slickstar Crisp This Full Member

    7,094
    5
    Apr 27, 2011
    Why not 6?
     
  7. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,168
    10,612
    Jul 28, 2009
    Did I make a case against 6 without being aware of it or did I simply say 7 was fair? 6-7 isn't too harsh, I don't think.