Let's Be Honest about Pac and yesterday's Welterweights.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DobyZhee, May 4, 2011.


  1. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    51,771
    17,299
    Mar 5, 2006
    If he was fighting during the golden era of the fab 4 (hearns, Duran, SRL, Hagler)

    Pac would have stayed at 140 or 135..:deal

    Out of all those for a megafight if he bravely chose or was promoted to foolishly fight, he definitely would have fought Duran. I think he could have fought SRL since he was the least powerful of the big 3. He would have a 'chance' against the leonard of leonard-duran I.

    Again, he gets blown out the water against a prime welterweight Hearns and Hagler (not the heavier versions seen later in their careers).

    He gives Duran a tough fight before getting KO'd.

    against SRL, I think he may go the distance.

    agree, disagree? thoughts?
     
  2. Slickstar

    Slickstar Crisp This Full Member

    7,094
    5
    Apr 27, 2011
    It's not fair to even think about putting him in with Hagler. That was a career middleweight. "Super welterweight" pacquiao on the other hand cries about getting catchweights.
     
  3. DKD

    DKD Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,437
    314
    Dec 16, 2010
    Hagler was always a middle never a welter.
     
  4. Colpolite

    Colpolite Guest

    *******s will disagree. They have Pacquiao winning against Godzilla and Tyson.
     
  5. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    Pac isnt a coward, he might actually would have fought them, I only give him a decent shot vs duran though, leonard and hearns both beat him. hagler fight would never happen.
    but those 2 guys are in the top 3 welters in the history of the sport, so there is no shame in it. I do think he would own prime hoya,trinidad,chavez at 140 and have a shot vs whitaker based on activity. this is controversial though.
     
  6. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    51,771
    17,299
    Mar 5, 2006
    :patsch

    alirght, light middleweight...He wouldn't even go for a vacant title if Hagler was around
     
  7. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    51,771
    17,299
    Mar 5, 2006
    I think they would agree and be happy given the circumstances and talent at welterweight in the 80's.
     
  8. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,813
    29,599
    Jul 26, 2004
    Ok.... so Pac, who shouldnt even be at welter imo, loses to a handful of the best welterweights in the history of the sport. Ok.

    And Hagler never even made a weightclass below middle in his entire career, completely irrelevent matchup.
     
  9. Colpolite

    Colpolite Guest


    You are wrong sir. Pacquiao is a God and cannot be beaten "*******s logic"

    Not even God himself or Jesus have a chance
     
  10. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    51,771
    17,299
    Mar 5, 2006
    exactly.:thumbsup

    I see no shame in that.
     
  11. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    51,771
    17,299
    Mar 5, 2006
    they are right about that statement since Pac is fighting today currently. Yesterday's fighters though.. we'll let them chime in..
     
  12. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    Pretty much my thoughts as well. I think Manny is a great fighter, top 30-40, but I'm not jumping to conclusions on him being a great WW. Mosley USED to be a great WW, but even he was never on the level of the Fab 4. Floyd, a former undisputed champ, but so was Spinks and Judah :lol: and all 3 basically fought the weak opponents to be in that position. Being undisputed WW champ against bums means nothing. Margarito and Cotto both were recently ko'd before Pacman got to them and Cotto seems to be making a decent comeback. Clottey a big defensive minded WW is about the best win for Manny at the moment because he's the only guy that wasn't damaged goods or recently ko'd. Manny beating a legit WW like Floyd or Ortiz would give him much more credibility. Comparing Manny or Floyd to the Fab 4 I see nothing at this point that would put them in a situation to beat Duran, Leonard, Benitez, Hearns, or Hagler. When Pacman or Floyd decide to fight Martinez, Ortiz, and each other, then we can make a case to compare to the true greats. Right now it's even laughable to compare.
     
  13. boxingfanneato

    boxingfanneato what would MORALES do! Full Member

    2,850
    2
    Jan 2, 2010
    many never gets higher than 140 dont blame the guy. 80s were stacked at 140 **** even @ 135 no reason to loofor bigger fights when u can have equally great wars in a division more suited for u
     
  14. paloalto00

    paloalto00 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    5
    Mar 15, 2009
    I can actually see Pac beating Duran. SRL would beat him but hell that would be a great fight to watch
     
  15. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    hearns ktfo duran after duran lost to hagler, does that make it a meaningless wins for the hitman? I think its one of his best wins, especially the way he took him out. Cotto is obviously pacs best win at welter.