I'm 100% positive Chad Dawson will beat Bernard Hopkins.

You sound like a dumbass hater.

That's not the reason at all.

It's because honestly, "who is Chad Dawson."

And I mean that in the sense that he can't draw flies to ****. He's an excellent boxer, but being a tall defensive southpaw with negligible power is the worst thing you can be in boxing.

It makes for very tedious, monotonous, boring fights.

If there was money in it, BHop would take it. Why do you keep doubting this man?

Who has BHop ducked?

It was just a few years ago when almost everybody was saying he was too old for Kelly Pavlik.

And almost NOBODY thought he was gonna get past Tarver.

Before that, there was no way he could beat Trinidad.

And even with his "losses," he still fought the best competition available.

So why don't you shut the **** up and enjoy the fact that you got to see a legend today. A true grandmaster of the sport.

 

Ok I'll save the sarcasm. I'm sure you're trolling, but I'm in the clouds a little so I'll humor you.

Dude, Hopkins just solidly got a UD over a guy that soundly defeated Chad.

What makes you think Chad can beat Hopkins, when Hopkins just went 1-0-1 with the only man to beat Chad.

 

This quote shows that you don't know **** about boxing.

Look at Hopkins record against southpaws.

Tarver was a tall, quick, defensive southpaw too and B Hop beat the **** outta him. He knocked him down once and was really laying it on his ass from round 11 to 12. Tarver was lucky he was able to survive.

Dawson on the other hand put on such a bull**** performance, that he had to fight the guy TWICE, when Tarver was OLD AS HELL.



So shut the **** up with your hating. It's a competitive fight, but you sound like a damn *****. Watch some Hopkins fights before you talk all this bull**** nonsense.

 

:roflYes that's why while Dawson was been calling him out the best 3 yrs, Hopkins was very quiet.

 

Winky, Calzaghe, Pavlik, and Jones all offered him more of it than Dawson did. And Dawson ****ed up his chance of getting the shot late last year after losing to Pascal. If Dawson won that fight (AND the ring belt) i'm sure Hopkins would've gone after him.

 

I know bull**** when I see it.

If you don't respect a man of Bernard's calibur, you don't know **** about boxing.

This is the greatest technical fighter of our generation.

And your dumbass says "it won't be competitive at all."

And you had the great foresight to be able to predict that Hopkins could easily beat Pascal who had so many holes in his game, yet still managed to take Dawson's heart and whup his ass.

So don't come at me with some bull**** hatin when I can tell you're talkin out your ass.

 

How often are people going to say, "So-and-So never throws enough, but will definitely step up their game for the big fight," in 2011, before they stop believing it?

Dawson's vulnerable to lead rights. Hopkins throws lead rights.

 

dawson doesnt have KO power either, with the way he fights now he is not getting anybody out of there. Dawson is also a much cleaner fighter than BHOP he won't resort to kidney punches or eye gouging.

 

some say the Klits are boring but they'll watch Hopkins with his
powder-puff punches win decisions over and over...

sept for Joe Calzaghe fight...

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9SfWjk00cs[/ame]

 

You can be as sure as you want, but remember one golden rule... never, ever put your money against hopkins.

With that said, I hope Hopkins retires, he really has nothing else to prove at this point.