He seemed not to care what public perception of him was, as he must of assumed it was irrelevant, however I think he might of underestimated how big of an impact it can have, cause, as a judge, whether your supposed to be objective or not, I cant help think that one of those judges, subconsciously, without even realizing, might of been pulling for Groves, and if they were, might that of swayed them to give him in the benefit of the doubt in some of the debatable rounds? cause if that is the case, I think illustrates how important public perception can be. Also, it was a close fight, and in close fight, you often get fans championing your cause, problem is, when majority of people WANT you to lose, would prefer your to lose, they're less likely to jump on your bandwagon, and champion your case for a rematch, to make out you won the fight, there might be a few, but no where near as many as there might of been had you not made an enemy of so many people. I remember when Froch fought Kessler, and at that point in his (Froch)career, most people, outside of Britain, weren't particularly fans of his, and for my money, there was a portion of fans pulling for Kessler because they wanted him to win, now Froch lost the fight officially, but I felt it might of been draw, or maybe Froch edged it, but my point is, no one seemed to want to accept that Froch might of got the decision, infact some people would dismiss it out of hand as blasphemy, as they seemed happy that he'd lost, as they preferred Kessler to be the winner, which seemed more of a slap in the face for Froch because of their dislike for him, rather than cause they thought Kessler actually won it clearly, then again, that was just my perception. The above is not a reflection of EVERYONE who thought Kessler won, but a portion imo. BTW, I dont begrudge anyone who thought Kessler did win, its conceivable, it was close, could of gone either way, but you take the point I'm trying to make in relation to De Gale and public perception. Dont know if this is relevant, just throwing it out there as food for thought.
LOL. Kinda feel sorry for him. He acted like a tit, Yes, but he's still a good fighter with huge potential. Just needs better people around him. I despise McDonnell more. I'd gladly hand him some rope and debit 20K from his account.
Find this interesting. I was thinking that Degales' demeanor in interviews etc before the fight and also his seeming confidence in his physical movements and expression perhaps make people overestimate his actual ability. This might be because it's all quick/mercurial action from him which seems impressive. Underneath that though it seems there isn't such a great ability to adapt to the unexpected. So, the point is that people think he is winning when he really isn't doing that much. Even his opponents seemed to lose face because they are dazzled by him, rather than hurt. He appears like a 'winner' (which really suited the amateur game). When he comes up against stiff opposition, in terms of opposition that is very tactically astute and has more than a few gameplans, his method doesn't work so well and this becomes glaringly obvious. And the general public already suspect that this is the case so don't trust him. In with Groves and the Booth fight-plan, the suspicions about his flashyness seem to be confirmed. So yes, I basically agree with you. It's interesting how much of the fight is won by attitude , and in the mind. Perhaps the best way is to have an attitude which is equal parts physical skill and strategy. Degale relied on physical skill. Groves had a bit of both.
You might be onto something there. What baffled me, was how frustrated he got, relatively early in the fight, I'd of expected that later into the fight, but......
If DeGale learns from this defeat, and it makes him a better fighter, then thus far, it is the best thing that has happened to him as a pro. Even in defeat, clearly he is no Audley. I think he will always need that arrogant streak in public, but as long as when he is training he realizes the errors he made, then there is no issue, and he will go on to be a big factor at 169/175 for many years to come. Last night, one way or the other, was a classic learning experience for DeGale. It could be the best thing that ever happened to him.
Looking back I think DeGale's body language in the lead up to the fight was telling. It was as if he was unsure of himself..... not that he thought he might lose, but he wasn't as certain of victory as he was when he fought say, Dilks or even Smith. He got it wrong and got beat.... there's always lessons you can learn from a loss, whether it be preparation or how you perform whilst in there. McDonnell has got to go, he was embarrassing at the press conference... ''I'll have a bet too.... I'll have a bet too.... c'mon Adam''. What a ****
Yeah man, Mcdonnell just lost himself his own gig by being a cheerleader, instead of what he's actually paid for, training his fighter and making sure he's prepared, mentally and technically, to cope with all eventuality's, and now he's gonna pay the price for it. The fighter aint gonna excuse you cause he enjoyed you massaging his ego, he's gonna make his decision based on results, as that's what he's paying you for.