is jake lamotta overated or underrated?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by shommel, Feb 22, 2011.


  1. BronxBull

    BronxBull New Member Full Member

    22
    0
    May 25, 2011
    in 100 fights he was never counted out.one of the best body punchers/infighters of all time. first person ever to beat sugar ray when he was in his prime, no one else has that claim. i think that must count for something.
     
  2. Raging B(_)LL

    Raging B(_)LL KAPOW!!! Full Member

    2,675
    47
    Jul 19, 2004

    It depends who you ask really, imo he is a bit of both, but overall I`d say he is underrated.
     
  3. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    I think LaMotta is a great fighter, you can see it in his movement, obviously durable as hell, tough as teak and cement head for sure, some great wins,

    but like Power Punch said a lot of WWs cum MWs and yet Jake struggled with MW weight limits, he was the natural bigger man. I have pointed this out often and the french Villimain is the best example of that...

    Steele, McAvoy, Apostili, Zale, Cerdan rematch and more yet I think could have bettered him more often than not.

    his film has elevated his status, but a great fighter none the less.
     
  4. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    411
    Jan 22, 2010
    S, just about my feelings about LaMotta.He started out with the toughies.
    Just think ,in his first eighteen months as a fighter,LaMotta had THIRTY TWO
    bouts with the likes of Jimmy Reeves, Jimmy Edgar, Nate Bolden,Jose Basora, Vic Dellicurti, and some tomato can named Ray Robinson. Remarkable,I think
    to start a career. No one was tougher ! Better ,yes, but none tougher ...