Haye or Adamek

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, May 31, 2011.


  1. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    adamek has about the same chance to decision vitali as haye does to KO wlad... not that much.

    EDIT: Holy **** the rapper i'm listening to just mentioned the bros...
     
  2. popejking

    popejking Adamek Full Member

    4,160
    1
    Mar 27, 2009
    I have my opinion and Adamek is a more natural fighter. In the next few months we will know a lot more. Both Wladimir and Vitali will be Haye and Adamek defining fights. They will show either how good they are or how much hyped they were. I am not saying that they have to win, but if they give good fights, then they may lose these fights and still impress.
     
  3. SonnyListonsJab

    SonnyListonsJab Active Member Full Member

    1,148
    4
    Apr 24, 2011
    I was wondering what the agenda was...and it all comes out. Mendoza is scared Wladimir's legacy will surpass Vitali's to the point of no turning back. So he wants to build up Vitali's opponents, so he can justify his placement of Vitali ahead of Wlad. Even though everyone knows Wlad has a far superior resume to Vitali, and will be fighting the far superior opponent this July.

    Haye has easily impressed me and most boxing fans more.

    Better than WBA champion Nikolay Valuev? :huh

    Sure. But he lacks athleticism, speed, power.

    There is no proof of that. Fat Arreola had Adamek in big trouble during their fight, and adamek looked only "ok" vs a washed up Michael Grant and an obese Kevin McBride. David Haye looks far more dominating on film.

    Haye is simply the much better fighter than adamek, period. He is much faster, has much better power in both hands, is the far greater all around puncher, has much more fluid movement, and has much better athleticism. Haye has potential "greatness" ability with his punching skills and speed, while Adamek will never be more than just a 'good' fighter. The only time Adamek faced a fighter comparable to David Haye in speed and athleticism, he got outpointed by light-heavyweight Chad Dawson.

    Haye has a better chance to beat Vitali than Wlad, because Vitali is easy to hit and old. Wladimir is younger, better defensively, and much more technically skilled than Vitali. It will be hard for Haye to reach Wlads chin, while he would have no trouble finding Vitali's chin with that low ponderous left. Vitali once again is choosing the easier mark.

    Wlad has fought Eddie Chambers, Ruslan Chagaev, and now David Haye in the last 3 years. These are better fighters than anyone Vitali has faced in the last 8 years.


    Haye picked Wlad, because Wlad is the Ring Magazine Linear heavyweight champion, after he stopped Ruslan Chagaev. Wlad is the MAN, vitali is not. Also Wlad has cleaned out the division and been the clear number 1 man the past 6 years, and haye wants a piece of that. Haye doesn't want to have to go through the # 2 man(vitali) to fight the # 1 man(Wlad).
     
  4. uglyandproud7

    uglyandproud7 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,882
    15
    Nov 15, 2009
    Whats the odds of Haye and Adamek fighting each other down the line after?