I am tired, ive smoked a **** load of weed and its nearly 4am. The judges and commentators mainly agreed with each other and even Johnson wasnt kickin off about the scores. But i had Johson winning it by a couple, 3 if i didnt wana call the 1st round even. Though he was proper on top at the end i thought hed left it way too late and only went for it then cuz Johnson had little left.
I know, im guna have to watch it again. Im guessin im givin Glen a litle too much credit for coming forward and landing some beautiful shots and Froch not enough for his countering. I just thought Johson may of thrown less but was more accurate, more damaging than Frochs work and was more on the front foot more than Froch until about the end of the 8th where he began to tire.
Even some of the Brits are seeing that the caveman got exposed. I agree Froch won it by 2, but only because the old man gassed so bad he couldn't even throw, and Froch took advantage by upping his workrate. I hope the Froch bandwagon prostitutes come out and explain their nuthugging after an old man walked him down.
Do you even watch boxing, or just suck boxer's ****? Name one round Froch won on anything other than workrate and Glen being too tired to match it.
From the top of my head Froch clearly won rds 4 5 10 11 12, you gave 1 even so you think Johnson won 2 3 6 7 8 9, no chance did he win all of those rds, especially the later ones. Froch won, it was close but clear in the end.
Which of those rounds are you arguing with?? 1 could've gone either way. 2 and 3 were Johnsons. 7 8 were surely Johnson. 6 and 9 if you're sucking Froch's dick.