Has Hopkins officially earned the title "Greatest Middleweight Ever"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hussleman, Jun 5, 2011.


  1. pride4jc1222

    pride4jc1222 Active Member Full Member

    945
    6
    Aug 3, 2009
    What Hopkins did from 1990-2004, dominating the middleweight division, make him the greatest middleweight ever IMO. Moreover, I don't think it's even close.
     
  2. The_President

    The_President Boxing Addict banned

    6,126
    1
    Apr 22, 2010
    ONE of the greatest, but NOT, The greatest.
     
  3. Body Head

    Body Head East Side Rape (CEO) Full Member

    2,944
    1
    Nov 15, 2009
  4. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    102
    Dec 26, 2009
    nah. but hes up there in the top 5 imo
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,242
    Sep 15, 2009
    And if you're suggesting he's the greatest fighter to fight as a middleweight, he aint even in the top ten of that list.
     
  6. WelshDevilRob

    WelshDevilRob Active Member Full Member

    1,167
    0
    Nov 12, 2006
    Hopkins title reign at Middleweight had numbers but the opposition wasn't too good.

    Great Middleweight - He's lucky if he gets in the top 10 - he didn't fight anybody apart from Roy Jones and he lost that one.

    What he does at a higher weight means nothing. He ignored Super Middleweight for years dispite having bigger paydays there.
     
  7. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    Hopkins knows how to box and has a great chin and is a mind player. That being said he also has the physical advantages with is height and reach to beat any MW in history. Being a successful world champion at MW at an advance age speaks volumes too.
     
  8. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    1. Hagler
    2. Robinson
    3. Greb
    4. Hopkins
    5. Monzon
     
  9. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    it means that he is great but it doesn't mean the he is GOAT
     
  10. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    68
    Mar 11, 2006
    I thought I mentioned him. Odd.

    No, he's certainly behind Hagler.
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,242
    Sep 15, 2009
    He only really became a champ in 2001 and ruled for 4 years. He's behind robinson, hagler, monzon, greb and zale for sure.
     
  12. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    68
    Mar 11, 2006
    The biggest reason Hopkins was able to have such a large amount of success was the fragmentation of the divisions. In other eras, there wasn't 154 and 168lbs who would be challanging for the middleweight title, which is part of the reason why Hopkins was able to dominate so quietly and for such a long time. For the majority of his reign, he fought nobody. He could have down up in weight to chase the glory but he chose not to and now he's left with a remarkably long list of defences yet you look at it and it's such a poor list. The two best middleweights he ever fought gave him a total of three losses.
     
  13. pride4jc1222

    pride4jc1222 Active Member Full Member

    945
    6
    Aug 3, 2009
    Actually, Hopkins became a champion in 1995, and ruled the Middleweight division for an entire decade. He went undefeated (20-0) during his prime, from 1995-2004. There is no disputing those facts.
     
  14. kopejh

    kopejh Guest

    two best middleweights being RJJ and who? Taylor? idiot
     
  15. bRoNeR**a**G

    bRoNeR**a**G Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,755
    2
    Mar 10, 2011
    I agree with ya 100% on that one, and add Grebb