The k-brothers could not pick beating up poor has beens if the division was not full of crap. Revoking heavyweight fighters licenses if they do fight at least three times year, unless they have a world title challenge. The k-brothers tactics only work, because the turn over in the division is tortoise like.
Adam Booth has, numerous times, offered to conduct public negotiations for full transparency, precisely avoid the idle small talk that goes on. To be honest this isn't the first accusation of the Klitschko's offering onerous and restrictive contracts and whilst they remain champions it probably won't be the last. For heaven's sake, as an example, Wlad would not agree to the fight if it was not guaranteed he would come out second. He wouldn't even flip a coin for it (after David had allegedly let him choose just about everything else). Whilst not conclusive it gives you an insight into the mind of a man who has to have everything his way. Look how many concessions Haye has had to make to get the fight agreed! The reason the negotiations have taken so long is that Wlad is finally fighting a man who has a title, therefore a bit of leverage and parity. All his other challengers were simply grateful for the opportunity and therefore took whatever they got. In all honesty why should Haye simply roll over and accept every term thrown at him?! I can assure you without any shadow of a doubt that Haye has always wanted this fight to happen. He has not asked for the world, just simply wanted the contract to more closely represent a compromise than a shutout.
To many brits fall for that "ony beating up fat cans". The Kitschkos nearly always have fought the best opposition avaliuable. That is as much a fact as Haye hasn´t (at least in his HW reign).
Don't you sit online all day to be an *******. Those are my thought's, if you don't like them then **** OFF shithead! :deal What a ****ing GOOF!
I can shed some light: http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=262561 How about this for showing just how hard K2 are to deal with? They obviously picked up some tips from their previous promoter. Tua, Toney, Dimitrenko, Adamek, Lewis, Mormeck, Haye, Povetkin, Valuev, Chisora, Byrd, Briggs, Solis, and those are the ones we know about, how many had complaints but didn't say due to signing a confidentiality clause? Klitschko fans will tell you it's all the aboves fault of course.
Povetkin was lying. His trainer Teddy Atlas revleaed the truth in an interview later. Povetkin is in a slaved contract not with the Klitschkos but with his own promoters.. Sauerland Promotion. Atlas said they rip him off and he's left with no money whatsoever in case he loses to Wlad: [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-zIuVi1Q5U&feature=related[/ame] See also: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...rland-a-punk-i-dont-even-want-to-be-in-boxing "It was a $2 million purse, and after it was over, [Povetkin] wasn't going to have anything, hardly...that's what the case was gonna be," Atlas says. So how is this the Klitschkos fault? Is it their fault guys like Povetkin and Valuev sign **** contracts with Sauerland? :think
The Klitschko's wanting their own doctor in their corner was a big thing btw. Its against the BBBofC rules. The Doctor has to be neutral