How I account for it? Brewster didn't beat Wlad by going toe to toe with him, he beat him when he was far behind on the scorecards. Got the sense?
No....that makes no sense still. You're saying that him going toe to toe would somehow equate that to being the best possible version of Brewster ever. Then you go on to say that this version of the best Brewster still couldn't beat Wlad. But if the best version couldn't....then how did the earlier version?
Wlad will not have to go toe to toe. He will control the ring, hit him with a lot of jabs, and eventually hit him on the button with a crushing right. It may take a few of the to hit the spot, but I believe he will. When he caught him in the 4th round of the first fight, Lamon will go down. Wlad throws is a lot less now, but throws it with twice the conviction now. If it hits the spot, the match is over. Im not saying that Wlad isn't going to get tagged a long the way a few times, but I believe you will see the ref stop the fight after lamon gets up from the canvas after a stright right down the pipe. Round 8 TKO
You probably have a different understanding of "the best Brewster" than I have. I say, he would have to have significantly improved if he wanted to go toe to toe with Wlad. That means, he would have to be better than before, even better than ever before. He would have to be the best Brewster ever. According to that definition, it is obviously possible that an earlier, worse version of Brewster could still defeat Wlad, as we all could see back in 2004. A worse version, because he couldn't go toe to toe with Wlad.
Brewster would be favoured to win a slugfest due to his superior durability. It would be much more sensible for Klitschko to box patiently and pick his shots, looking to land the big ones. Which he'll almost certainly do tomorrow night.
OK, but even then, if a worse version of Brewster by your own definition could beat Wlad, why would a better version of him, the best ever from what you're saying, lose to Wlad?
Ohhh of course. If Lamon is "significantly improved" over the Lamon that beat Wlad already, then he has a chance to win. That's makes all the sense in the world. :nut :rofl If Lamon comes in "significantly improved" over the first Lamon, Wlad is getting carried out of the ring on a stretcher. Funny how people seem to casually forget that Lamon already kicked Wlad's ass. :-(
Such a ridiculous overstatement. Brewster showed amazing heart and chin in that fight, but there is no way he "kicked Wlad's ass". Wlad is able to hurt Brewster, a lot of people seem to forget how Wlad knocked him down with a 1-2 combination..which is what Klitschko will do tomorrow.
That doesn't mean that Brewster won't go right back inside and launch a couple of shots before the ref can seperate them.