This takes the cake!
He would also have issues with Norton it will always be close with frazier, Ali dominated the 60s because the heavies of that era were weak!
when you do not know how to analyze technique properly and lack historical context , then you will type the dumb **** you typed and think both...
stanley ketchel and billy papke are better than anyone mentioned and better than lamotta!
you dont know what you are looking at . in terms of defense hes harder to hit than ali and joe louis. The punch and grapple style that johnson...
no a great jab doesnt translate to any era when jab defense in jeffries era is vastly superior(different) than holmes era . You didnt have guys...
I got Klaus here all these folks picking Kalambay know nothing of the resume and skillset of Klaus!
you gotta look at the skills dempsey displayed on film , and Gibbons , Miske ,carpienter etc are very skilled boxers .
Dempsey murders Norton!
Also pay attention to where joes hands end up on the infighting he usually had them inside of his opponents arms giving him options with both...
you are judging joe louis by a modern lens, as I already knew before you typed your rebuttal, it is the same **** with you guys . It is punching...
Yes he was boxing perfection those bitching about footwork only judge boxers who look like sugar ray leonard ,they do not understand there are...
only heavyweight boxer i wouldnt favor him over is jack johnson he beats everyone else definitively!
papke way too violent for jermain taylor , it ends in a brutal ko!
what exactly did frazier do b etter than joe louis ,who were these guys joe had trouble with , lets deep dive into things , instead of make espn...
