glad you're not a Tyson hater... I've never thought much of him!
You don't know it would have been much different any more than I do... it's just speculation. To look at this in a different way, what fighters...
I thought the whole matter was a bit off. I'm not really being critical of the poster, but there is a small possibility the guy's family may read...
I quite apologise then:lol: Although I don't really see much flaw regarding the reasoning.
Stop reading my posts in the lounge section :lol: Size, regarding boxing, isn't necessarily a determining factor.
Mythical best describes what goes on most of the time regarding this part of the forum. A myth guy vs a myth guy. The nutrition, or especially,...
He fought heavier guys before that! I'm not a huge size freak, mcvey:lol:
And the Holmes that actually fought Tyson proved none of this. How can you be so certain a younger Holmes would have done any better? A prime...
But that still doesn't really get into the fact that prime Tyson was probably better than anybody Holmes faced during his prime. Holmes, old or...
35 or 100, he probably would have still lost. Tyson (at that point) was better than any opposition Holmes had faced. Holmes never beat anybody of...
I guess all of Rocky's opponents can consider themselves fortunate he never took steroids then :lol: I like a funny post on here from time to time!
Either that or he actually WORKED for what he was :lol:
When since some like goo, Dr. Z and Russell wish to compare current fighters with those of time past this topic becomes important. Did I just...
And you post that on a Classic Forum? :lol:
I'll say Dopes... mainly because that is what some expect me to say :D
