Marciano wasn’t a tiny slow bungler. Tiny maybe but others of his height and reach have been champion. We aren’t going to agree here. But for...
Negative. The man beat several men of similar caliber as Holyfield. There is zero proof he didn’t have the durability to fight Holy. Quite the...
There wasn’t one bit of boxing technical breakdown in your entire rant.
Marciano wasn’t an attrition puncher. He was just inaccurate as all heck. His biggest flaw.
Probably plays out similar to Walcott. Marciano will eventually out pace him. Holyfield’s defense also wasn’t as good as Walcotts. Holys offense...
Zero chance he hit just as hard. They’re not in the same stratosphere.
Usyk is great but we will never know how good because he only fought a certain type of fighter and didn’t beat enough ranked men at HW to claim...
lol maybe boring. But I would be interested in who would win because of the styles
Looks like he was dying of exhaustion against Max. You’re right some fighters get it worse than others. I don’t have an explanation for such...
It’s because of his Italian heritage lol. It’s because he was a lazy trainer, poor stamina, not great defense. Galento like Wilder could have been...
I agree with you but for some reason men with great power get away with more than regular fighters. Look at Foreman and Wilder for example....
Would have been an interesting fight between Terrell and Carnera
Lewis but realistically he could beat anyone if he caught them.
1) FOTC 2)Louis v Schmeling 2 3) Foreman v Moorer 4) Dempsey v Willard 5) Ali v Foreman 6) Johnson v Jeffries 7) Tyson v Holyfield 8) Holmes v...
Patterson’s handlers never would have matched them together. Marciano would have been to much in 56.
