willard did show a good jab and you're right, he wasn't come forward but cautious. by the time dempsey fought him though, i don't give him much...
[IMG] vs [IMG] both heads look solid, robust and buttable. but i give the edge in attitude to pryor edit: aaron pryor also looks a LOT...
that's fair but bivins, maxim and johnson all rate higher than virtually all of dempsey's victims save maybe gibbons. if you consider maxim and...
**** me....just watching some moore now. what a brilliant ****ing jab. never thought of him much as a jabber but it was great: sharp, powerful...
very good post. like the lou ambers comparison
good point. but that fight took advantage of moore's physical decline with a MUCH faster younger fighter. willard would have been a come forward...
what i'd like to fight like is probably marvin hagler. what i used to fight like when i spared was a less subtle version of tony galento. what...
you may like roy jones more than i do....:good
good call
agreed. the fact that willard was the reigning titlest doesn't mean as much as his overall quality, which wasn't that much the HOF fighters he...
:deal
absolutely accurate in most ways but the problem is you're throwing facts out without any context... he beat louis...who was nearly the corpse...
fair enough. who would you say were moore's top 3 wins/opponents? for dempsey I'm thinking sharkey, fulton and gibbons for moore...bivins,...
i wonder though...i only really learned of moores heavyweight resume. how would it stack up to dempseys in an objective side by side analysis....
on the surface, the comparison is fare and certainly not overwhelming in favour of dempsey...and luf, bivins may be the best name though im...
