But everything that comes out of Boente's mouth is the truth yeah? :rofl
Well thats an improvement no? The Charr fight just rounds of what is a horrendus looking resume.
If Dereck Chisora can land consistently on Vit im pretty sure Haye will do ok :nut **** me are you serious, Wlad is way harder to land on than...
His resume is crap, his best 2 opponents he lost to, he needs a big win and Haye is a massive name in the Heavyweight division love him or loathe him.
Yeah because their the same fighters arnt they, when will you twits learn just because one wins doesnt mean the other does or shouldnt have to...
Because it currently looks **** poor maybe? :nut
Haye would make Vitali look like the slow ass past it arm puncher he is. Dont worry though, your boy Boente will keep Vitali well away from him...
Vitali needs a big win on his resume and wether you like him or not thats exactly what Haye is :deal
Ive only seen his last 2 fights but i think he's the next big thing, looks class to me.
:nut Manual Charr on the other hand.....
Best losser? What the **** sort of language is this? To answer your question, i think they both deserve credit for taking on anybody, both have...
The fact you rate it as 60/40 :lol: together with it being Hayes best win :lol: Adamek is nothing at Heavyweight, a win over him means nothing....
The question is what was the better fight, clearly the Haye Chis was better to watch. Wlad/Thompson was ****ing ****. You my friend have mental...
You get worse with every post, you gotta be trolling, you cant actually be that dumb :-(
Your opinion is worthless Manning, you have already proved yourself a ******.
