I just think it's the way he's seen off his opponents that get's him close. I know Murray, Macklin and Geale etc are not exactly elite but...
Of course he does. Definitely top 5.
Froch's spot on. There's no comparison resume wise, Ward's is far superior to triple G's
Because he's taking the Wilder route to a belt. Tried and tested you see.
I've got to back Uncle Clemmy up here though. He certainly was a well known boxer i remember him,he even had a nickname,they called called him...
I agree but that's not my point. To be fair Khan has went out there and fought better opposition although as N17 says lately he hasn't,probably...
He gets cut a lot of slack considering how light his resume is. Khan's level of opposition has been way higher and he gets stick.
Anybody who contends that stoppage simply lacks basic intelligence.
People with an agenda heh.
Uncle Clemmy will come to the rescue of this outrageous slur shortly.
If the smaller guy is good enough and has the right attributes, then he can beat the present day large robots. There have been countless examples...
1. He's not the champ 2. Yes he's the worst beltholder.
Ali Patterson Tyson Louis
My God Jim was boring to watch, but he never seemed to be in any trouble in there,he just generally picked his opponent off and got the job done....
:rofl:rofl:rofl
