All I saw was a guy landing the harder shots and doing damage, with the other fighting like an amateur and throwing lots of punches, which were...
Pretty much every reporter had it 114-113 for Hopkins. AP, ESPN, Yahoo, USAToday, etc....
Had he won the fight convincingly, then I would say yes, but I thought he lost to a 43 year old Hopkins, who only improved his legacy with this fight.
I don't think Hopkins necessarily dominated, but he was the clear victor for me, as for many reporters at ringside. He landed the cleaner and more...
Your boy won a very close fight against a 43 yr old Hopkins, think about that for a second...43 FREAKIN years old, and Hopkins was the one who did...
Hopkins without question, especially after seeing this fight.
I had Hopkins winning a close fight. Either way, I was way more impressed with Hopkins, who at 43, had Calzaghe fighting his fight and landed the...
This hardly counts as a "real" victory as he was the one beat up in the fight.
Throwing amateur fights doesn't win fights, or at least it shouldn't in pro boxing
Pitty pat punches don't win fights. He did no damage during the entire fight
His punches were ineffective. BS decision.
Calzaghe's punches were pitty-pat, not effective punches at all. BS decision
That's just stupid...
Hopkins won that fight. This isn't amateur boxing.
I have the winner (if it's a clear victory) as p4p #1, as both guys are top-5 p4p and have fought and beat better opposition than Mayweather and...
