Nope.... I use context, my man. That's like saying the Ray Leonard Norris defeated was "great"
To a certain extent, he really hasn't. His best win is against Madrimov, that says a lot
No, because that wasn't the best version of Spence
That version of Spence was not great
Conwell would be the best fighter Crawford has fought. That's for sure
I honestly think this is the answer. Ennis jab from the Southpaw and Orthodox stance is more lethal than the best "natural" orthodox and south paw...
Using context, no!
This is what you call overrating an opponent to make a fighter look better than he actually is
I swear to God, I have never seen a fighter as overrated as Crawford.
Mmmmm I thought he beat Williams and Canelo tbh. I would say yes
Lara by UD. Crawford may be more rugged but Lara is the better overall boxer with better defense
Seriously? Why?
Madrimov is not on the level of tszyu and Ennis.
Disagree. The only fighters I see beating virgil is Tszyu and Ennis. Madrimov is.not.some "elite" fighter. He is rwally.good.but far from elite.
I think the boxing community has turned Crawford into something he is not (a master boxer). Crawford is a mix of a skilled brawler with...
