The clause was only if joe lost and a rematch would be in cardiff...dont panic there wont be a jones v calzaghe 2
Fair enough dully noted but we all know tv stations/ networks build up fighters and blow smoke up there ass to get max audeince when it comes to...
im not saying saturdays win for calzaghe is great jones was in his prime blah blah my point is a lot of people on here dismiss the fact that...
Big reg ...Im not saying joes win over hopkins and jones deserves credit, i know a lot of people are saying that he does, i wish joe would fight...
So thats your answer to everything is it FAIL, SON , DAWSON AND JOHNSON WOULD KILL CALZAGHE, JOES A BUM...ETC ETC Your really Intelligent arent...
At last somebody with a sensible reply, :thumbsup
SON..... Your not my dad in fact im probaley old enough to be your dad. You know your not really worth me wasting my time in typing a reply. your...
I agree you with 100 % i do think that some people want calzaghe to fight untill he lost his 0 doesnt matter who its against as long joe loses at...
I agree with you that jones isnt the fighter he use to be but IMO if jones was totally shot on saturday night he wouldnt have had the knockdown in...
Im stupid im I unlike having my head up my arse and thinking every up and coming american boxer is the dog bollocks and its ok for them to fight...
Theres a difference between being totally shot and past there prime.. jones wasnt totally shot.
People say jones was shot, im not saying he was in his prime far from it but i dont think jones was taotally shot..to me TYSON v kevin...
This is not an anti american thread i just want to know why its ok for younger american boxers to fight older and so called past it boxers....
First of all joe calzaghe gets no credit for fighting boxers that are old and past it. joe is 36 himself. BUT chad dawson who is 26 has fought...
calzaghe wanted to beat up salem brother or cousin or something at the weigh in...
