That make Klitschko a lock.
The only rational way to evaluate fighters is to look at their entire careers. If you want to selective about which fights should count, then you...
Sure Sweet Pea, your opinion is definitely unbiased. :patsch So, you want to use depth of resume. OK, when was the last time Floyd got TKO'd by...
Please, please be true.
PBF-not the best fighter ever, but his undefeated record and titles in 5 weight classes are an accomplishment worthy of consideration. And, he's...
Depth of resume is a matter of opinion. Wins, KOs, titles held, etc. are not. So, like I said, on any unambigious criteria, Jones is easily better.
Anyone with a frame that big and who's had as many fights (pro and amateur) will eventually develop chronic injuries, like his hand.
If all you need to do is 'face' (and lose to) a great fighter to be considered great, where do you rank Ross The Boss Purrity and Hurricane McNeely?
Get a ref. that will tolerate his dirty tactics, and get three judges who are very pro-US
SSM (147) vs. Kimbo (200+)?
Mothra TKO8
Other than winning fights and knocking out his opponents, what do you expect of a great boxer?
I stand corrected. However, under any unambigious/clear-cut criteria Jones is better.
Your criteria sounds pretty subjective. So, how about this: I rank Whitaker somewhere well below Bojorquez and I rank RJJ well above Bojorquez....
As long as he keeps fighting day-laborers that his management picks-up at Home Depot, his chances of getting KO'd again are 50-50
