the 2 others had it 96-94, I think, I didn't pay much attention
yeah, the last judge had it a draw 94-94, don't know what he was on
Agree
I didn't know that. Anyway, he spent the better part of his career at MW and lower classes
Elite opponents : Tunney : 0-2 Sharkey : 1-0 (should have been 0-1 DQ) Gibbons : 1-0 He missed out on the other 2 elite boxers of his time :...
And Johansson
Because bias. Patterson is one of the most overrated HW champion in history. And Schmeling's top wins are better than Walcott's, even including...
What about the constant holding and the low blows though ? I feel he refereeing as well as the decision were terrible
Sharkey was the better, may have always been
Well, he picked unproven greenies who had been exposed in their previous fights, hypejobs, unknwn journeymen and Frazier's son. His next move was...
He went to Tyson beltless, that's why. There's no way a champion who picks Cobbs, Frazier's son, a LHW and some random guys nobody remembers for...
Not only that, but also : all the good names you find in his resume were coming off a couple of losses or bad nights shortly before they fought...
Alright Holmes was a savvy businessman. He didn't want to lose the milking cow, which he knew he would if he kept facing strong opponents. If all...
I was actually referring to Michael's little brother. And Cobb was a massive hypejob, a close loss to an old washed-up Norton is proof to that....
He didn't duck the stream of hypejobs that Don King was directing to him : Spinks, Ledoux, Cooney, Cobb
