and no head movement, Bud on points 118-110.
Nope, to me the best ever is someone who could never be beat, anytime they stepped in the ring they found a way to win, whether it was against...
You can't be the best ever if you lost a fight, the sooner people realise this, the better.
Doesn't matter what losses he avenged, on those nights he lost, and that's what make Crawford the best ever, every time he went into the ring, all...
cheers, but someone has to be the best ever, no reason why it can't be Crawford.
haha whenever someone wins, the other guy is suddenly **** and was never that good, classic. You mean prime Hagler, who lost to a guy that...
yes, because age isn't as relevant now Crawford is 38 and looked the best he has ever looked along with when he was 35 against Spence, even floyd...
literally proving my whole point haha, humans and athletes have moved on and evolved, now 35-38 year olds are still elite, 50 years ago they were...
Another myth, stop letting nostalgia ruin your brain.
Crawford, Spence, D Garcia, Porter, Thurman + more. in 50 years time people say this was 'the golden era'. duran lost like 15 times mate
there is like 7, most have gone, you're always gonna have some that stand, but most have gone. And look at the records that are more relevant to...
you didn't even watch them, you weren't around in that era so how do you know good it actually was, you just say those names because everyone who...
thank you for agreeing with my OP, all these nostalgia merchents lack knowledge.
you can pick holes in every boxers record in history, give me a name and i will tear it apart.
