ahh john there you are always making sure im always in check.
i believe that maggos point on shavers fighting frequently definatly rings true to shavers losses.i would not even be surprised if he took many...
well that is the conversation im talking about then.but if he wasnt one of the greatest then why is his name always mentioned.yes he was extremly...
wow!i cant believe you consider shavers mediocre.i do believe his name would be mentioned in a "greatest fighters of all time" conversation....
which fight do i need to watch of holmes that shows him in yalls opinion peak form.ive looked at a few of them and was impressed by his jab...
im not sure how to do this but would one of you computer savy guys start a thread on prime ali vs prime holmes.please.this is one i think would be...
so this means lewis would only fight tyson 13 yrs removed from his prime.
good point but that doesnt mean charlie goldman exceeds stewards or duvas status.i guess you apply the same advancements to goldman and then see...
this one time at band camp.................
no doudt toney!!!!!
gene hatcher ,boom boom mancini,donald curry,lynn ball,ed too tall jones does that even count,and of course my father nick wells sr.and i know...
so then its a complete mismatch
trainers,advancements in equipment and facilities,legal suppllements etc..
so with this are you saying holmes was more of a go the distance fighter instead of a power punchin ko artist?just curious.
holmes.but if rocky had the advancements in sports technology of today then what kind of fight is it?
