Sure so why should anyone watch anything but HWs then?
Those are entirely different things don't be dense. Or do you think that Anthony Joshua is a better boxer then Sugar Ray Robinson?
GGG and Lomachenko for sure or really any Eastern European fighter that's not named Usyk, and even he has his haters over here.
Its how good a boxer is regardless of weight i.e how good would a boxer be if they were the same size
You mean the one Monzon won every round?
Get your facts straight he won once and in my eyes won them all. Griffith was good but idk i like LMR and Napoles more personally
I gave a list. I don't hate on him I think its stupid to rank him as high as you do based on a couple of wins much more deserving fighters out...
You mean the guy who probably wasn't eve a top ten at the time? Amazing resume truly.......
So basically being the second best fighter of an era makes you top ten as long as you also lose to Ali. Good to know
Because all of them have actual title reigns you're banking a lot on a couple of good wins
All this thread has shown is that you can't tell when a fighter is in decline
He destroyed 4 good fighters all of whom he had a huge physical advantage over. That's doesn't make you a top 5 HW. Ali, Louis, Wlad, Lewis,...
Maybe in the past not anymore lol see way more people hating on them these days.
Years bro fighters decline especially someone like Quarry who's been in war after war. If you think Quarry was the same as when he was at his best...
Ignoring that most people on the forums hate Mayweather lol
