Agreed it counts against Wlad to a extent but more so Vitali that's a fair way of putting it.
Wlad lands first on Shavers but Holmes beats Sanders on points with a few rocky moments along the way is how I see it.
AJ Takam might be one.
I think Marciano catches him at some point.
I sense a discussion about Greb and the resume old timers vs Wlad's on the way as the new topic :p
I did say Vitali has some arguments in his favor those being some the one's you mentioned. But the comment I was responded to said Vitali was 100%...
I see it as a 70/30
Vitali could have been better but IMO Wlad's resume was better and he achieved more. Vitali still has some arguements in his favour but don't...
If you are arguing that then fine. I was only trying to say a lot of fighters did stuff and got away it as well (as you point out some didn't get...
It went a bit into the deep end so this will be my last post on this matter. Perhaps I wasn't clear that my point wasn't you couldn't criticise...
McGrain is warning bans might want to be careful.
The 20 wins in title fights Wlad had (25 if you count the WBO reign) definitely makes up for the losses to a very large extent. I just have a nack...
That's what I rate so high about Holmes he was one of the hardest guys to dominate only Mike Tyson had easy time with him in a 75 fight career...
I have no problems with the criticisms against Wlad but just stating throughout history there have been a large number of fighters who have done...
I meant much more compared to butting and other forms of dirty fighting. But no not compared to Wlad-Povetkin which I agree and have always said...
