Holding even on the higher end is way more accepted by referees in boxing than bites and headbutts and the other stuff so it's semantics which is...
Not just talking about holding I mean generally there are lots of fighters who did so many stuff the ref's let pass that happened multiple times....
No Neck's post at the beginning of the page. It wasn't only Wlad who did things that referees allowed. Lots of fighters throughout history have...
I would assume so as well but the side options were not completely unplausible so I gave it a little cover.
Yes he would have insane physical advantages here even more than when he dominated.
Something about a fight with Farr intrigues me a bit.
If Wlad as he was in real life fighting Louis's list of opponents as they were in real life I think he does it against opponents who in my book...
Holmes also had 2 decisions he should have won go against him so you can easily balance it out.
People want Wlad lose badly tbf just because they don't like his style even though it was effective.
35 rounds lost in his career.
Ref's being different could have changed the outcome of certain fights in history and we could speculate but ultimately it didn't happen which is...
If he top 3 or not is subjective but there are people who can justify why they rank him that way if they do.
While Joe Louis is probably the majority pick here is he 2nd for quantity or actually the quality of his wins? Or both?
Chambers had a chin but also he was pretty elusive and mobile so the shots often didn't land clean.
I would say it didn't work as well there but Wlad was starting to land more later on the fight and he should have been given a KD in R9.
