You favour Crawford over Robinson then ?
Disagree and Benitez has better wins as well. Canelo has a better chin Benitez was better everywhere else
Saying Duran struggled with smart technical boxers is like saying Tarver was better than Jones.
Duran would have beaten Leonard no matter what that first time. Leonard couldn’t beat him on the outside, he was feinted in to a knot whenever he...
This is why I have Foreman higher than most. However a limited guy like Tommy Morrison was able to outbox him. He wouldn’t have beaten any prime...
Crawfords record is closer to Khan than Duran…
Disagree. Back in the day everybody boxed, boxing was bigger then, the best athletes usually boxed, men boxed because they had to, to put bread...
Leonard can barely touch him and when he does his lethal left hook does nothing, but Crawford can just go for the kill and take him out ? Jesus
You’re missing the point of Duran being past his prime and facing bigger men. They weren’t smarter than him.
He was flat footed because it was his best chance to beat that Duran, it still wasn’t good enough. He was outboxed at range, bullied in close by...
I sometimes think the Spinks KO is a bit overrated, just because of Spinks’ knees being bad. As someone with bad knees myself, one realises...
He didn’t fight any of those in his prime except Leonard. He wasn’t outsmarted by any of them either, he was outsped by Hearns and Benitez, and...
Ridiculous.
Anyone can find flaws in any boxer, but what has Crawford done to be the best ever in your eyes ? He’s not the only boxer that’s never lost. By...
I thought this was going to be about Tua v Ruiz
